REIT - Residential
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MRP vs LAND vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
Banks - Diversified
MRP vs LAND vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Specialty | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $4.49B | $387M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $713M | $88M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $463M | $-6M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 96.9% | -11.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 85.1% | 24.0% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | — | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.11B | $538M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $27M | $343.34B |
MRP vs LAND vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Millrose Properties… (MRP) | 100 | 127.4 | +27.4% |
| Gladstone Land Corp… (LAND) | 100 | 78.2 | -21.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 121.2 | +21.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRP vs LAND vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.6%, EPS growth 264.9%
- 7.6% FFO/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 14.4x)
LAND is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 6.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 80.3%, current ratio 1.67x
- Beta 0.58, yield 6.3%, current ratio 1.67x
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs MRP's 47.9%
- +21.8% vs LAND's -6.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.6% FFO/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 65.0% margin vs LAND's -6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs LAND's -6.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs LAND's -0.5%, ROIC 5.6% vs 1.5% |
MRP vs LAND vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MRP vs LAND vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3182.5x LAND's $88M. MRP is the more profitable business, keeping 65.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAND's -6.7%. On growth, MRP holds the edge at +135.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $713M | $88M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $610M | $58M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $463M | -$6M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.4B | $6M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +96.9% | -11.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +85.1% | +24.0% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +65.0% | -6.7% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +7.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +135.7% | -1.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.7% | -196.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MRP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, MRP trades at a 25% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MRP's 13.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $387M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.6B | $897M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.94x | -30.90x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.41x | — | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.35x | 15.33x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.48x | 4.38x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 0.49x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.22x | — | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MRP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-1 for LAND. MRP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MRP scores 6/9 vs LAND's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | -0.9% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | -0.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +1.5% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +1.9% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.80x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $511M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $27M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.1B | $538M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.36x | 1.59x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,745 for LAND. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs LAND's -6.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs LAND's -14.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | +0.7% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.3% | -6.8% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | -38.1% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | -52.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | +37.3% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.9% | -14.8% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LAND and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LAND is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs LAND's 68.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.58x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.00 | $13.00 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.30 | $8.47 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +68.9% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 35.9 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 535K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LAND and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MRP as "Buy", LAND as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.8% upside for LAND (target: $13) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, LAND offers the higher dividend yield at 6.26% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.33 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 11 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.2% | +6.3% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.80 | $0.56 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +3.9% |
MRP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MRP vs LAND vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRP or LAND or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) is the stronger pick with 3.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRP or LAND or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Millrose Properties, Inc.
(MRP) is the cheapest at 11. 9x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Millrose Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRP or LAND or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -52. 6% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus LAND's +37. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRP or LAND or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
58β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 63% more volatile than LAND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRP or LAND or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) is pulling ahead at 3.
7% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Millrose Properties, Inc. grew EPS 264. 9% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Gladstone Land Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRP or LAND or JPM?
Millrose Properties, Inc.
(MRP) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 3% net margin versus 15. 3% for Gladstone Land Corporation — meaning it keeps 63. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRP leads at 80. 9% versus 26. 0% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MRP leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRP or LAND or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Millrose Properties, Inc.
(MRP) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAND: 48. 8% to $13. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRP or LAND or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) offers the highest yield at 6. 3%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is MRP or LAND or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
58), 6. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LAND: +37. 3%, MRP: +47. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRP and LAND and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (MRP (Real Estate) and LAND (Real Estate) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MRP is a small-cap deep-value stock; LAND is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.