Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PLBC logo
PLBC
BANR logo
BANR
COLB logo
COLB
WAFD logo
WAFD
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PLBC
Plumas Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$398M
5Y Perf.+155.9%
BANR
Banner Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.28B
5Y Perf.+76.9%
COLB
Columbia Banking System, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.45B
5Y Perf.+10.4%
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.85B
5Y Perf.+38.1%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PLBC logoPLBC
BANR logoBANR
COLB logoCOLB
WAFD logoWAFD
KO logoKO
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$398M$2.28B$7.45B$2.85B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$112M$819M$3.21B$1.39B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$30M$195M$550M$243M$13.70B
Gross Margin81.5%79.0%67.7%52.8%61.7%
Operating Margin35.4%29.5%23.4%22.4%29.3%
Forward P/E10.1x10.9x10.2x11.4x25.3x
Total Debt$148M$373M$4.01B$1.82B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$81M$183M$511M$657M$10.27B

PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PLBC
BANR
COLB
WAFD
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Plumas Bancorp (PLBC)100255.9+155.9%
Banner Corporation (BANR)100176.9+76.9%
Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB)100110.4+10.4%
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD)100138.1+38.1%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: COLB and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. PLBC, BANR, and WAFD also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PLBC
Plumas Bancorp
The Banking Pick

PLBC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 48.6%, EPS growth -5.4%
  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
  • NIM 4.0% vs WAFD's 2.5%
  • 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
BANR
Banner Corporation
The Banking Pick

BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.94 vs WAFD's 3.69
  • Lower P/E (10.9x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.94 vs 2.26
Best for: valuation efficiency
COLB
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
The Banking Pick

COLB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in dividends and momentum.

  • 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
  • +40.2% vs BANR's +11.1%
Best for: dividends and momentum
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.
The Banking Pick

WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 59.8%, current ratio 0.15x
  • Beta 0.66, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.15x
  • Beta 0.66 vs COLB's 1.18
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs COLB's 17.1%
  • 13.1% ROA vs WAFD's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.9%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPLBC logoPLBC48.6% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
ValueBANR logoBANRLower P/E (10.9x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.94 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs COLB's 17.1%
Stability / SafetyWAFD logoWAFDBeta 0.66 vs COLB's 1.18
DividendsCOLB logoCOLB3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)COLB logoCOLB+40.2% vs BANR's +11.1%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs WAFD's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.9%

PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PLBCPlumas Bancorp
FY 2025
Service
83.0%$3M
Bank Servicing
17.0%$641,000
BANRBanner Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
65.3%$25M
Credit Card, Merchant Discount
34.7%$14M
COLBColumbia Banking System, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Service Charges on Deposits
32.2%$84M
Card-based Fees
22.2%$58M
Account Service Fees
21.8%$57M
Investment Advisory, Management and Administrative Service
13.4%$35M
Transaction-based and overdraft service charges
10.3%$27M
WAFDWaFd, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPLBCLAGGINGWAFD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PLBC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 440.1x PLBC's $112M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COLB's 17.1%.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBANR logoBANRBanner CorporationCOLB logoCOLBColumbia Banking …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$112M$819M$3.2B$1.4B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$41M$253M$895M$277M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$30M$195M$550M$243M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M$248M$724M$215M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+81.5%+79.0%+67.7%+52.8%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+35.4%+29.5%+23.4%+22.4%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.4%+23.8%+17.1%+17.5%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.1%+30.3%+22.5%+15.5%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.9%+11.2%+5.9%+46.3%+18.2%
PLBC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.9x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 56% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.03x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBANR logoBANRBanner CorporationCOLB logoCOLBColumbia Banking …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$398M$2.3B$7.5B$2.9B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$466M$2.5B$10.9B$4.0B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.47x11.92x13.61x14.10x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.06x10.92x10.24x11.35x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.20x1.03x4.58x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.76x9.77x12.23x13.41x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.68x2.78x2.32x2.02x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.41x1.19x1.19x0.98x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.64x9.19x10.56x13.71x67.15x
BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. BANR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BANR scores 7/9 vs PLBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBANR logoBANRBanner CorporationCOLB logoCOLBColumbia Banking …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.3%+10.3%+8.4%+8.0%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.5%+1.2%+0.9%+0.9%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.2%+7.7%+5.4%+3.9%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.1%+10.1%+2.0%+5.7%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937677
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.57x0.19x0.51x0.60x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$67M$190M$3.5B$1.2B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$81M$183M$511M$657M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$148M$373M$4.0B$1.8B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.85x1.11x0.82x0.48x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PLBC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PLBC five years ago would be worth $21,015 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,336 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, COLB leads with a +40.2% total return vs BANR's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLBC at 17.5% vs WAFD's 11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBANR logoBANRBanner CorporationCOLB logoCOLBColumbia Banking …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+30.3%+9.3%+13.7%+17.1%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.1%+11.1%+40.2%+32.5%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.0%+59.7%+55.0%+37.6%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+110.2%+35.1%-6.6%+29.5%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+574.9%+101.5%+54.0%+91.9%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.5%+16.9%+15.7%+11.2%+13.7%
PLBC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WAFD and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs COLB's 95.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBANR logoBANRBanner CorporationCOLB logoCOLBColumbia Banking …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.71x0.67x1.18x0.66x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$57.00$69.83$32.70$37.10$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$39.70$57.05$21.91$26.31$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+96.3%+95.7%+99.9%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.460.063.463.860.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded56K218K2.5M525K12.7M
Evenly matched — WAFD and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — COLB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PLBC as "Buy", BANR as "Hold", COLB as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.6% upside for PLBC (target: $62) vs -5.6% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, COLB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.61% vs PLBC's 2.09%.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBANR logoBANRBanner CorporationCOLB logoCOLBColumbia Banking …WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$61.50$64.25$32.90$35.00$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts313191148
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+2.9%+3.6%+2.8%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises5151656
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.18$1.96$1.13$1.05$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.5%+1.5%+3.6%+0.2%
Evenly matched — COLB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

PLBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BANR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallPlumas Bancorp (PLBC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PLBC vs BANR vs COLB vs WAFD vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger pick with 48.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD or KO?

On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.

9x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Plumas Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 94x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) delivered a total return of +110.

2%, compared to -6. 6% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLBC returned +574. 9% versus COLB's +54. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning COLB is approximately -689% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banner Corporation (BANR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is pulling ahead at 48.

6% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD or KO?

Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

4% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLBC leads at 36. 6% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBC leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLBC: 8. 6% to $61. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD or KO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 1% for Plumas Bancorp (PLBC).

09

Is PLBC or BANR or COLB or WAFD or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, COLB: +54. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PLBC and BANR and COLB and WAFD and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (PLBC (Financial Services) and BANR (Financial Services) and COLB (Financial Services) and WAFD (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PLBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.