Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PLBC vs BANR vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
PLBC vs BANR vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $398M | $2.28B | $355.61B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $819M | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $195M | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | 79.0% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 35.4% | 29.5% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 10.9x | 25.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $148M | $373M | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $183M | $10.27B | $343.34B |
PLBC vs BANR vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) | 100 | 255.9 | +155.9% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 176.9 | +76.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLBC vs BANR vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLBC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 48.6%, EPS growth -5.4%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- NIM 4.0% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs BANR's -0.9%
BANR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 2.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 19.1%, current ratio 0.02x
- Beta 0.67, yield 2.9%, current ratio 0.02x
- Beta 0.67 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 27.8% margin vs JPM's 20.4%
- 13.1% ROA vs BANR's 1.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.7%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs BANR's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs JPM's 20.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.1% vs BANR's +11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs BANR's 1.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.7% |
PLBC vs BANR vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PLBC vs BANR vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLBC leads in 1 of 6 categories
BANR leads 1 • KO leads 1 • JPM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLBC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2503.2x PLBC's $112M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $819M | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41M | $253M | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | $195M | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $248M | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.5% | +79.0% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.4% | +29.5% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +23.8% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +30.3% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.9% | +11.2% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 56% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $398M | $2.3B | $355.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $466M | $2.5B | $390.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.47x | 11.92x | 27.18x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.06x | 10.92x | 25.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.20x | 1.03x | 2.43x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.76x | 9.77x | 26.39x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.68x | 2.78x | 7.42x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 1.19x | 10.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.64x | 9.19x | 67.15x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for BANR. BANR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BANR scores 7/9 vs PLBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | +10.3% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.2% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +7.7% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +10.1% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.19x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $67M | $190M | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $183M | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $148M | $373M | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.85x | 1.11x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PLBC and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,506 for BANR. Over the past 12 months, PLBC leads with a +31.1% total return vs BANR's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.3% | +9.3% | +20.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.1% | +11.1% | +17.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.0% | +59.7% | +47.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.2% | +35.1% | +65.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +574.9% | +101.5% | +121.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.5% | +16.9% | +13.7% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PLBC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLBC currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.67x | -0.20x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.00 | $69.83 | $84.04 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.70 | $57.05 | $65.35 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +96.3% | +98.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.4 | 60.0 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 56K | 218K | 12.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BANR and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLBC as "Buy", BANR as "Hold", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.6% upside for PLBC (target: $62) vs -4.4% for BANR (target: $64). For income investors, BANR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.92% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.50 | $64.25 | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 13 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.9% | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $1.96 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
PLBC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BANR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PLBC vs BANR vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLBC or BANR or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger pick with 48.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Banner Corporation (BANR). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLBC or BANR or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.
9x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Plumas Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLBC or BANR or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +35. 1% for Banner Corporation (BANR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLBC returned +574. 9% versus BANR's +101. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLBC or BANR or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banner Corporation (BANR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLBC or BANR or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is pulling ahead at 48.
6% versus -0. 9% for Banner Corporation (BANR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for Plumas Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLBC or BANR or KO or JPM?
Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
4% net margin versus 20. 4% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — meaning it keeps 27. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLBC leads at 36. 6% versus 26. 0% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBC leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLBC or BANR or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLBC: 8. 6% to $61. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLBC or BANR or KO or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is PLBC or BANR or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLBC and BANR and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (PLBC (Financial Services) and BANR (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PLBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.