Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $398M | $2.88B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $644M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $209M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | 79.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 35.4% | 43.7% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 14.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $148M | $991M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $108M | $343.34B |
PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) | 100 | 255.9 | +155.9% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLBC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 2.1%
- Rev growth 48.6%, EPS growth -5.4%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.8% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.81 vs CVBF's 4.64
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 4.64
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PLBC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 4.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PLBC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.1% vs CVBF's +16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PLBC's 0.4% |
PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PLBC and CVBF each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2503.2x PLBC's $112M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $644M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41M | $294M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | $209M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $217M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.5% | +79.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.4% | +43.7% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +32.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +33.7% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.9% | +11.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PLBC and JPM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, PLBC trades at a 22% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs CVBF's 4.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $398M | $2.9B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $466M | $3.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.47x | 13.97x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.06x | 14.74x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.20x | 4.40x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.76x | 13.37x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.68x | 4.48x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 1.26x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.64x | 13.26x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $9 for CVBF. CVBF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVBF scores 6/9 vs PLBC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | +9.3% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +6.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +9.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.43x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $67M | $883M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $108M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $148M | $991M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.85x | 2.12x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PLBC and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,522 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, PLBC leads with a +31.1% total return vs CVBF's +16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs PLBC's 17.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.3% | +14.8% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.1% | +16.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.0% | +64.4% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.2% | +15.2% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +574.9% | +66.9% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.5% | +18.0% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PLBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLBC currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.81x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.00 | $21.48 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.70 | $17.95 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +98.8% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.4 | 60.1 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 56K | 1.6M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLBC as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.50 | $24.75 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 16 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +3.8% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $0.82 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.8% | +3.9% |
PLBC leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Risk & Volatility. 4 categories are tied.
PLBC vs CVBF vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLBC or CVBF or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger pick with 48.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLBC or CVBF or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the cheapest at 12.
5x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Plumas Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLBC or CVBF or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +15. 2% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLBC returned +574. 9% versus CVBF's +66. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLBC or CVBF or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 34% more volatile than PLBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLBC or CVBF or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is pulling ahead at 48.
6% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CVB Financial Corp. grew EPS 5. 6% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for Plumas Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLBC or CVBF or JPM?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 20. 4% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 26. 0% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBC leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLBC or CVBF or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 14. 7x for CVB Financial Corp. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLBC or CVBF or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is PLBC or CVBF or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 2. 1% yield, +574. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLBC: +574. 9%, CVBF: +66. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLBC and CVBF and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.