Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PYXS vs MGNX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
PYXS vs MGNX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $106M | $255M | $6.75B | $2.35B | $6.77B | $875.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14M | $157M | $0.00 | $236M | $51M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-82M | $-70M | $-506M | $-369M | $-315M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 99.8% | 69.9% | — | 90.7% | 33.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -6.2% | -40.5% | — | -168.6% | -7.0% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $107M | $72K | $99M | $82M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $57M | $902M | $222M | $357M | $343.34B |
PYXS vs MGNX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS) | 100 | 13.2 | -86.8% |
| MacroGenics, Inc. (MGNX) | 100 | 20.3 | -79.7% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 414.2 | +314.2% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 75.8 | -24.2% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 138.3 | +38.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 176.2 | +76.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PYXS vs MGNX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PYXS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 6 stocks, MGNX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IMVT doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
RCUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +156.6% vs JPM's +19.1%
KYMR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.90
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 0.90, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 0.90 vs RCUS's 1.98, lower leverage
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 454.4% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 230.5%
- 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
- 20.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs RCUS's 1.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.6% vs JPM's +19.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs PYXS's -85.0%, ROIC 4.5% vs -71.1% |
PYXS vs MGNX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PYXS vs MGNX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
KYMR leads 1 • PYXS leads 0 • MGNX leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, MGNX holds the edge at +57.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14M | $157M | $0 | $236M | $51M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$81M | -$57M | -$532M | -$391M | -$352M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$82M | -$70M | -$506M | -$369M | -$315M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$67M | -$72M | -$407M | -$489M | -$244M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.8% | +69.9% | — | +90.7% | +33.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | -40.5% | — | -168.6% | -7.0% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | -44.8% | — | -156.4% | -6.1% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | -45.6% | — | -2.1% | -4.7% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +57.5% | — | -39.3% | +55.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | +10.8% | -14.1% | +10.5% | +13.4% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PYXS and MGNX and KYMR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $106M | $255M | $6.8B | $2.3B | $6.8B | $875.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $109M | $304M | $5.8B | $2.2B | $6.5B | $1.47T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.30x | -3.40x | -11.87x | -7.08x | -22.48x | 15.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — | 14.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — | 1.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — | 18.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.63x | 1.70x | — | 9.50x | 172.78x | 3.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.94x | 4.56x | 7.04x | 3.97x | 4.43x | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 8.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-148 for MGNX. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -135.6% | -147.8% | -68.2% | -69.0% | -25.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -85.0% | -28.4% | -62.2% | -35.3% | -22.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -71.1% | -144.1% | — | -64.1% | -24.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -80.4% | -34.7% | -68.3% | -42.1% | -27.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 1.92x | 0.00x | 0.16x | 0.05x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $50M | -$902M | -$123M | -$275M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $57M | $902M | $222M | $357M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $107M | $72,000 | $99M | $82M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -4.78x | — | -13.38x | -2119.53x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KYMR leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,265 for PYXS. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +156.6% total return vs JPM's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 48.9% vs PYXS's -17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.2% | +149.1% | +26.9% | +0.0% | +14.0% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.5% | +134.5% | +103.6% | +156.6% | +71.4% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.7% | -30.6% | +51.6% | +15.9% | +230.0% | +133.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.3% | -81.2% | +207.0% | -6.4% | +64.1% | +110.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.3% | -84.8% | +230.5% | +37.1% | +149.4% | +454.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.9% | -11.5% | +14.9% | +5.0% | +48.9% | +32.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KYMR and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KYMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs PYXS's 30.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 1.59x | 1.67x | 1.98x | 0.90x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.55 | $4.64 | $36.27 | $28.72 | $103.00 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.97 | $1.19 | $14.32 | $7.91 | $36.65 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.1% | +86.4% | +90.6% | +81.1% | +80.5% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 49.1 | 51.9 | 39.3 | 47.7 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 528K | 1.0M | 1.9M | 1.1M | 493K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PYXS as "Buy", MGNX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 229.3% upside for PYXS (target: $6) vs 8.1% for JPM (target: $339). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.50 | $6.00 | $43.67 | $31.17 | $119.93 | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 22 | 23 | 18 | 26 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KYMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PYXS vs MGNX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PYXS or MGNX or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PYXS or MGNX or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -87. 3% for Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +454. 4% versus PYXS's -86. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PYXS or MGNX or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 98β — meaning RCUS is approximately 121% more volatile than KYMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PYXS or MGNX or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pyxis Oncology, Inc. grew EPS 3. 0% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PYXS or MGNX or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PYXS or MGNX or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or JPM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PYXS: 229.
3% to $5. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — PYXS or MGNX or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. PYXS, MGNX, IMVT, RCUS, KYMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is PYXS or MGNX or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 9% yield, +454. 4% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +454. 4%, RCUS: +37. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PYXS and MGNX and IMVT and RCUS and KYMR and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (PYXS (Healthcare) and MGNX (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and RCUS (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PYXS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while PYXS, MGNX, IMVT, RCUS, KYMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.