Asset Management
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SII vs BEN vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Banks - Diversified
SII vs BEN vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $3.06B | $16.70B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $386M | $9.03B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $84M | $812M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 83.4% | 73.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | 9.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 25.3x | 11.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $13.30B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $118M | $3.57B | $343.34B |
SII vs BEN vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sprott Inc. (SII) | 100 | 329.1 | +229.1% |
| Franklin Resources,… (BEN) | 100 | 153.2 | +53.2% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SII vs BEN vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SII is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 75.2%, EPS growth 38.7%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- 75.2% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
BEN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 93.7%, current ratio 2.71x
- Beta 1.32, yield 4.1%, current ratio 2.71x
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 25.3x)
JPM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- PEG 0.81 vs SII's 1.32
- NIM 2.2% vs SII's 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 75.2% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BEN's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs SII's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +89.8% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BEN's 0.7% |
SII vs BEN vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SII vs BEN vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SII leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 726.1x SII's $386M. SII is the more profitable business, keeping 21.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEN's 9.0%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $386M | $9.0B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $121M | $1.2B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $84M | $812M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $126M | $938M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.4% | +73.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +9.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +9.0% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +10.4% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +143.5% | +100.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 64% valuation discount to SII's 44.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs SII's 2.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $16.7B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $26.4B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.83x | 35.31x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.29x | 11.73x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.33x | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.48x | 23.26x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.39x | 1.90x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.35x | 1.17x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.96x | 18.32x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SII leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SII delivers a 23.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $6 for BEN. BEN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.94x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SII scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.5% | +5.6% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.5% | +2.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.1% | +1.6% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.8% | +2.0% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.94x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$118M | $9.7B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $118M | $3.6B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $13.3B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 94.69x | 15.19x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SII five years ago would be worth $29,214 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,362 for BEN. Over the past 12 months, SII leads with a +89.8% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SII at 54.8% vs BEN's 11.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.1% | +36.4% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +89.8% | +47.9% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +271.1% | +37.2% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.1% | +13.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +555.3% | +39.2% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.8% | +11.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BEN and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SII's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEN currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs SII's 70.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 1.32x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $169.63 | $32.47 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.94 | $21.11 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.0% | +99.0% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.0 | 58.1 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 174K | 4.2M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BEN and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SII as "Buy", BEN as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -0.4% for BEN (target: $32). For income investors, BEN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.13% vs SII's 1.09%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $32.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 27 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +4.1% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.30 | $1.33 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.4% | +3.9% |
SII leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SII vs BEN vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SII or BEN or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sprott Inc.
(SII) is the stronger pick with 75. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sprott Inc. (SII) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SII or BEN or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Sprott Inc. at 44. 8x. On forward P/E, Franklin Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SII or BEN or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Sprott Inc.
(SII) delivered a total return of +192. 1%, compared to +13. 6% for Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SII returned +555. 3% versus BEN's +39. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SII or BEN or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning SII is approximately 60% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 94% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SII or BEN or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sprott Inc.
(SII) is pulling ahead at 75. 2% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sprott Inc. grew EPS 38. 7% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SII or BEN or JPM?
Sprott Inc.
(SII) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 2% net margin versus 6. 0% for Franklin Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SII leads at 33. 0% versus 6. 9% for BEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SII leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SII or BEN or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for Sprott Inc. — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SII or BEN or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 1% for Sprott Inc. (SII).
09Is SII or BEN or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, BEN: +39. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SII and BEN and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SII is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEN is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.