Medical - Care Facilities
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TOI vs USPH vs OPCH vs ADUS vs HCSG vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
TOI vs USPH vs OPCH vs ADUS vs HCSG vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $5.41B | $999M | $3.25B | $1.74B | $1.60B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $546M | $695M | $5.67B | $1.45B | $1.84B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $11M | $206M | $100M | $59M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | 22.0% | 18.0% | 32.5% | 13.3% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -6.0% | 12.5% | 5.9% | 9.8% | 3.0% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.6x | 11.3x | 13.3x | 20.7x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $104M | $426M | $0.00 | $209M | $25M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $36M | $233M | $82M | $161M | $10.27B |
TOI vs USPH vs OPCH vs ADUS vs HCSG vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Oncology Instit… (TOI) | 100 | 52.8 | -47.2% |
| U.S. Physical Thera… (USPH) | 100 | 80.9 | -19.1% |
| Option Care Health,… (OPCH) | 100 | 149.6 | +49.6% |
| Addus HomeCare Corp… (ADUS) | 100 | 100.8 | +0.8% |
| Healthcare Services… (HCSG) | 100 | 91.5 | -8.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOI vs USPH vs OPCH vs ADUS vs HCSG vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.8%, EPS growth 23.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.8%
- 27.8% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
- +100.4% vs OPCH's -34.9%
USPH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.89, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.01x
- 2.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
OPCH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.
- Lower P/E (11.3x vs 25.3x)
- Beta 0.29 vs TOI's 1.95
ADUS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 369.2% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 19.2%, current ratio 1.80x
- PEG 0.66 vs KO's 2.26
HCSG doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 27.8% margin vs TOI's -8.0%
- 13.1% ROA vs TOI's -26.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs -41.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.8% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.3x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs TOI's -8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs TOI's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (4 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.4% vs OPCH's -34.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs TOI's -26.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs -41.2% |
TOI vs USPH vs OPCH vs ADUS vs HCSG vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TOI vs USPH vs OPCH vs ADUS vs HCSG vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
OPCH leads 1 • TOI leads 1 • USPH leads 0 • ADUS leads 0 • HCSG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 90.3x TOI's $546M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOI's -8.0%. On growth, TOI holds the edge at +41.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $546M | $695M | $5.7B | $1.4B | $1.8B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | $109M | $406M | $159M | $72M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $11M | $206M | $100M | $59M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$26M | $67M | $244M | $137M | $139M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +22.0% | +18.0% | +32.5% | +13.3% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +12.5% | +5.9% | +9.8% | +3.0% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | +1.5% | +3.6% | +6.9% | +3.2% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | +9.6% | +4.3% | +9.5% | +7.6% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.2% | +7.7% | +1.3% | +7.7% | +6.6% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.5% | -115.0% | +3.6% | +17.2% | +175.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
OPCH leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, OPCH trades at a 65% valuation discount to USPH's 46.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ADUS offers better value at 0.89x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $999M | $3.2B | $1.7B | $1.6B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $1.4B | $3.0B | $1.9B | $1.5B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.83x | 46.17x | 16.35x | 17.90x | 27.62x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.64x | 11.31x | 13.35x | 20.67x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.89x | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.51x | 7.38x | 12.04x | 22.45x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.75x | 1.28x | 0.57x | 1.22x | 0.87x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.29x | 2.56x | 1.59x | 3.20x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.37x | 12.57x | 16.76x | 11.52x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $1 for USPH. HCSG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADUS scores 7/9 vs TOI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +1.4% | +15.3% | +9.3% | +11.8% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.5% | +0.9% | +6.0% | +7.0% | +7.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -41.2% | +5.6% | +15.3% | +8.8% | +9.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.7% | +7.6% | +12.8% | +10.9% | +7.7% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.55x | — | 0.19x | 0.05x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $70M | $390M | -$233M | $127M | -$136M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $36M | $233M | $82M | $161M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $104M | $426M | $0 | $209M | $25M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.96x | 8.24x | 5.50x | 14.45x | 33.02x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TOI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,257 for TOI. Over the past 12 months, TOI leads with a +100.4% total return vs OPCH's -34.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOI at 111.1% vs USPH's -13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.7% | -15.7% | -35.6% | -12.5% | +29.0% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +100.4% | -13.8% | -34.9% | -18.2% | +51.0% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +841.3% | -35.5% | -30.9% | +0.5% | +55.4% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.4% | -37.8% | +1.1% | +2.7% | -24.9% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | +33.5% | +127.6% | +369.2% | -30.2% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +111.1% | -13.6% | -11.6% | +0.2% | +15.8% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TOI's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs OPCH's 56.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 0.89x | 0.29x | 0.43x | 1.12x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.58 | $93.50 | $36.80 | $124.44 | $24.39 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.02 | $58.19 | $18.01 | $87.95 | $12.66 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +70.1% | +56.4% | +75.0% | +91.7% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.3 | 53.5 | 44.1 | 49.9 | 59.0 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 199K | 3.2M | 231K | 646K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — USPH and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TOI as "Buy", USPH as "Buy", OPCH as "Buy", ADUS as "Buy", HCSG as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.7% upside for TOI (target: $8) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, USPH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.75% vs KO's 2.46%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $96.00 | $31.22 | $122.00 | $24.50 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 13 | 14 | 16 | 15 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | — | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.80 | — | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +9.5% | 0.0% | +3.8% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPCH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TOI vs USPH vs OPCH vs ADUS vs HCSG vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOI or USPH or OPCH or ADUS or HCSG or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Oncology Institute, Inc.
(TOI) is the stronger pick with 27. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Option Care Health, Inc. (OPCH) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TOI or USPH or OPCH or ADUS or HCSG or KO?
On trailing P/E, Option Care Health, Inc.
(OPCH) is the cheapest at 16. 3x versus U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc. at 46. 2x. On forward P/E, Option Care Health, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Addus HomeCare Corporation wins at 0. 66x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TOI or USPH or OPCH or ADUS or HCSG or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -47. 4% for The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADUS returned +369. 2% versus TOI's -45. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TOI or USPH or OPCH or ADUS or HCSG or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus The Oncology Institute, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning TOI is approximately -1074% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Healthcare Services Group, Inc. (HCSG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TOI or USPH or OPCH or ADUS or HCSG or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Oncology Institute, Inc.
(TOI) is pulling ahead at 27. 8% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Healthcare Services Group, Inc. grew EPS 52. 8% year-over-year, compared to -22. 8% for U. S. Physical Therapy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOI leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TOI or USPH or OPCH or ADUS or HCSG or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -12. 1% for The Oncology Institute, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -7. 2% for TOI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TOI or USPH or OPCH or ADUS or HCSG or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Option Care Health, Inc. (OPCH) trades at 11. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TOI: 50. 7% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TOI or USPH or OPCH or ADUS or HCSG or KO?
In this comparison, USPH (2.
8% yield), KO (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. TOI, OPCH, ADUS, HCSG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TOI or USPH or OPCH or ADUS or HCSG or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). The Oncology Institute, Inc. (TOI) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, TOI: -45. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TOI and USPH and OPCH and ADUS and HCSG and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (TOI (Healthcare) and USPH (Healthcare) and OPCH (Healthcare) and ADUS (Healthcare) and HCSG (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TOI is a small-cap high-growth stock; USPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPCH is a small-cap deep-value stock; ADUS is a small-cap high-growth stock; HCSG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. USPH, KO pay a dividend while TOI, OPCH, ADUS, HCSG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.