Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
VSTM logo
VSTM
MGNX logo
MGNX
RCUS logo
RCUS
FATE logo
FATE
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VSTM vs MGNX vs RCUS vs FATE vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VSTM
Verastem, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$284M
5Y Perf.-80.1%
MGNX
MacroGenics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$252M
5Y Perf.-85.8%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.40B
5Y Perf.-3.8%
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$240M
5Y Perf.-94.0%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

VSTM vs MGNX vs RCUS vs FATE vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VSTM logoVSTM
MGNX logoMGNX
RCUS logoRCUS
FATE logoFATE
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$284M$252M$2.40B$240M$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$50M$157M$236M$6M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-194M$-70M$-369M$-130M$57.05B
Gross Margin83.7%69.9%90.7%53.8%60.0%
Operating Margin-344.6%-40.5%-168.6%-22.1%25.9%
Forward P/E14.4x
Total Debt$77M$107M$99M$78M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$205M$57M$222M$47M$343.34B

VSTM vs MGNX vs RCUS vs FATE vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VSTM
MGNX
RCUS
FATE
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Verastem, Inc. (VSTM)10019.9-80.1%
MacroGenics, Inc. (MGNX)10014.2-85.8%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)10096.2-3.8%
Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE)1006.0-94.0%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VSTM vs MGNX vs RCUS vs FATE vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Verastem, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. MGNX also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
VSTM
Verastem, Inc.
The Growth Play

VSTM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 209.1%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 128.4%
  • 209.1% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
Best for: growth exposure
MGNX
MacroGenics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

MGNX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.43, current ratio 5.10x
  • Beta 1.43, current ratio 5.10x
  • +155.5% vs VSTM's -30.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

RCUS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, FATE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 40.0%
  • 20.4% margin vs FATE's -20.6%
  • Beta 0.94 vs RCUS's 2.00
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVSTM logoVSTM209.1% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs FATE's -20.6%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs RCUS's 2.00
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MGNX logoMGNX+155.5% vs VSTM's -30.3%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs VSTM's -91.6%

VSTM vs MGNX vs RCUS vs FATE vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VSTMVerastem, Inc.
FY 2025
Government rebates and other incentives
77.7%$4M
Trade discounts and allowances
15.7%$888,000
Returns
6.6%$376,000
MGNXMacroGenics, Inc.
FY 2025
Revenue From Collaborative Agreements
62.4%$87M
Contract Manufacturing
37.6%$53M
RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
FATEFate Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Upfront Fee And Equity Premium
100.0%$31M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

VSTM vs MGNX vs RCUS vs FATE vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGFATE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 44384.6x FATE's $6M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FATE's -20.6%. On growth, MGNX holds the edge at +57.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVSTM logoVSTMVerastem, Inc.MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$50M$157M$236M$6M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$170M-$57M-$391M-$127M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$194M-$70M-$369M-$130M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$151M-$72M-$489M-$108M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+83.7%+69.9%+90.7%+53.8%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.4%-40.5%-168.6%-22.1%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.9%-44.8%-156.4%-20.6%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.0%-45.6%-2.1%-17.1%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+57.5%-39.3%-20.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+61.5%+10.8%+10.5%+18.8%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MGNX and RCUS and FATE each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricVSTM logoVSTMVerastem, Inc.MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$284M$252M$2.4B$240M$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$156M$301M$2.3B$271M$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.36x-3.36x-7.23x-1.79x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.19x1.68x9.70x36.13x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.97x4.50x4.05x1.18x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
Evenly matched — MGNX and RCUS and FATE each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VSTM. RCUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricVSTM logoVSTMVerastem, Inc.MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.9%-147.8%-69.0%-58.9%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-91.6%-28.4%-35.3%-39.4%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-144.1%-64.1%-36.5%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-139.0%-34.7%-42.1%-43.1%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–942025
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.34x1.92x0.16x0.38x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$128M$50M-$123M$31M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$205M$57M$222M$47M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$77M$107M$99M$78M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-208.73x-4.78x-13.38x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $229 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, MGNX leads with a +155.5% total return vs VSTM's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FATE's -27.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVSTM logoVSTMVerastem, Inc.MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-43.3%+146.0%+2.2%+108.1%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-30.3%+155.5%+154.5%+47.1%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-58.5%-31.5%+18.3%-61.9%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.8%-81.0%-3.1%-97.7%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.2%-85.0%+40.0%+15.7%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-25.4%-11.8%+5.8%-27.5%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs VSTM's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVSTM logoVSTMVerastem, Inc.MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.64x1.43x2.00x1.93x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.25$4.64$28.72$2.88$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.55$1.19$7.91$0.91$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+36.4%+85.3%+82.9%+71.5%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.753.346.547.859.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.1M1.0M1.1M3.2M7.0M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: VSTM as "Buy", MGNX as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", FATE as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 345.1% upside for VSTM (target: $18) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricVSTM logoVSTMVerastem, Inc.MGNX logoMGNXMacroGenics, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.25$6.00$31.00$5.50$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts1922183161
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VSTM vs MGNX vs RCUS vs FATE vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VSTM or MGNX or RCUS or FATE or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Verastem, Inc.

(VSTM) is the stronger pick with 209. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — VSTM or MGNX or RCUS or FATE or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -97. 7% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus MGNX's -85. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — VSTM or MGNX or RCUS or FATE or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning RCUS is approximately 112% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — VSTM or MGNX or RCUS or FATE or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Verastem, Inc.

(VSTM) is pulling ahead at 209. 1% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fate Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -10. 3% for MacroGenics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSTM leads at 128. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — VSTM or MGNX or RCUS or FATE or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is VSTM or MGNX or RCUS or FATE or JPM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VSTM: 345.

1% to $18. 25.

07

Which pays a better dividend — VSTM or MGNX or RCUS or FATE or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. VSTM, MGNX, RCUS, FATE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is VSTM or MGNX or RCUS or FATE or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, RCUS: +40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between VSTM and MGNX and RCUS and FATE and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (VSTM (Healthcare) and MGNX (Healthcare) and RCUS (Healthcare) and FATE (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: VSTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGNX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while VSTM, MGNX, RCUS, FATE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.