Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 5.0x · EV/EBITDA 2.7x · ROE 10.5%. (2004–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.8B | $2.2B | $1.8B | $2.7B | $2.9B | $3.6B | $6.4B | $11.9B | $4.8B | $4.6B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.8B | $2.1B | $1.8B | $2.5B | $2.4B | $1.4B | $4.3B | $10.1B | $3.5B | $3.5B | $2.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 5.01 | 6.74 | 24.55 | — | — | — | — | 79.55 | — | — | 56.31 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.44 | 1.94 | 6.60 | 11.18 | 12.09 | 7.45 | 13.47 | 14.27 | 16.55 | 36.50 | 22.65 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.96 | 1.15 | 1.37 | 2.41 | 4.14 | 3.94 | 4.58 | 3.87 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.34 | — | — | 12.50 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.31 | — | — | 12.25 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.86 | 6.41 | 10.52 | 10.07 | 2.90 | 9.07 | 12.07 | 12.08 | 27.45 | 15.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | 2.73 | 3.72 | — | — | — | — | — | 26.93 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 3.03 | 6.84 | — | 341.17 | — | — | — | 27.34 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.82 | — | — | 8.35 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 97.3% | 97.3% | 87.4% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 99.7% | -9.5% | 49.7% | -11.8% | -71.9% | -7.8% |
| Operating Margin | 45.1% | 45.1% | -68.3% | -36.8% | -54.3% | -34.2% | -37.4% | 44.2% | -15.5% | -70.7% | -8.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 28.8% | 28.8% | 26.9% | 88.3% | -90.4% | -25.9% | -63.9% | 17.9% | -10.1% | -91.0% | 41.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.5% | 10.5% | 2.6% | 8.0% | -8.4% | -4.7% | -11.0% | 7.3% | -2.6% | -13.1% | 9.6% |
| ROA | 8.5% | 8.5% | 1.7% | 4.7% | -4.4% | -2.3% | -5.2% | 4.0% | -2.1% | -9.8% | 7.1% |
| ROIC | 12.5% | 12.5% | -5.2% | -2.8% | -7.9% | -24.8% | -16.7% | 57.4% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | 14.2% | 14.2% | -4.9% | -2.2% | -3.0% | -3.4% | -3.4% | 11.0% | -3.8% | -8.6% | -1.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.01 | 0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.07 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.03 | -0.02 | -0.06 | -0.19 | -0.83 | -0.79 | -0.64 | -1.06 | -1.14 | -1.28 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.15 | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | -4.91 | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.51 | — | — | -4.15 |
| Interest Coverage | 136.71 | 136.71 | -2.39 | 4.47 | -6.74 | -10.54 | -15.42 | 199.92 | -39.28 | -122.40 | -244.47 |
Net cash position: cash ($88M) exceeds total debt ($7M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 20.15 | 20.15 | 9.97 | 9.02 | 8.11 | 8.58 | 8.45 | 10.26 | 6.04 | 6.98 | 9.70 |
| Quick Ratio | 20.15 | 20.15 | 9.81 | 8.84 | 8.01 | 8.55 | 8.45 | 10.26 | 6.04 | 6.97 | 9.70 |
| Cash Ratio | 19.61 | 19.61 | 9.30 | 8.60 | 7.83 | 8.30 | 8.12 | 10.11 | 5.87 | 6.70 | 9.38 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.33 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.12 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 0.68 | — | — | 0.08 | 1475.12 | 1647.41 | 1169.84 | 783.16 | 465.25 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 17.46 | 62.87 | 99.97 | 117.02 | 96.81 | 132.39 | 35.02 | 42.38 | 120.02 | 66.16 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 20.0% | 14.8% | 4.1% | — | — | — | — | 1.3% | — | — | 1.8% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.0% | — | — | 8.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $66M | $66M | $66M | $66M | $66M | $65M | $58M | $52M | $49M | $46M |
Rapid liquidity depletion
According to current market data, the company trades at a P/S ratio of 1.44 and a P/B of 0.50, suggesting that investors are pricing the equity significantly below its book value, likely reflecting deep skepticism regarding the future commercial viability of the remaining oncology-focused research pipeline.
The low P/B multiple indicates that the market assigns little value to the company's intangible assets or proprietary drug discovery platform. This valuation gap suggests that investors view the current cash position as the primary source of value, effectively discounting the potential for future clinical breakthroughs.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has fluctuated between -1.5% and 19.1% over the last ten quarters, highlighting a fundamental inability to consistently generate returns on invested capital that exceed the cost of funding its extensive and high-risk clinical development programs.
The erratic nature of these returns is largely driven by the timing of milestone payments rather than operational efficiency. This volatility suggests that the company's capital allocation strategy is currently failing to compound value, necessitating a more disciplined approach to R&D spending to avoid further erosion of shareholder equity.
Based on the provided data, the cash conversion cycle has exhibited extreme instability, swinging from -278,864 days in 2024Q3 to -82 days in 2026Q1, which underscores the company's reliance on irregular collaboration-related cash flows rather than a predictable, self-sustaining operational cycle typical of mature biotechnology firms.
The massive fluctuations in days sales outstanding and days payable outstanding suggest that working capital management is secondary to the accounting treatment of the Gilead partnership. Investors should monitor these metrics for signs of normalization, as the current volatility obscures the true underlying efficiency of the company's core operations.
As indicated by recent quarterly filings, the current ratio has declined from a peak of 10.13 in 2024Q3 to 30.48 in 2026Q1, yet this figure is misleading as it masks a rapid depletion of absolute cash reserves that threatens the firm's ability to fund ongoing operations.
While the current ratio appears high, the underlying cash burn rate suggests that the company's liquidity position is far more precarious than the headline numbers imply. The lack of debt provides a temporary cushion, but the rapid consumption of capital warrants immediate investigation into potential future financing needs.
The P/E ratio of 5.01 is frequently misapplied to this business model, as it obscures the reality that reported earnings are heavily distorted by non-recurring milestone payments and accounting amortization rather than sustainable, recurring cash flows generated from the company's core therapeutic product portfolio.
Using P/E to value a company in this stage of development is fundamentally flawed because it ignores the massive R&D burn and the binary nature of clinical outcomes. Analysts should instead focus on cash burn from operations and the remaining runway of the Gilead collaboration to assess true solvency.
Includes 30+ ratios · 22 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GLPG stock.
Galapagos N.V.'s current P/E ratio is 5.0x. The historical average is 36.8x.
Galapagos N.V.'s current EV/EBITDA is 2.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.3x.
Galapagos N.V.'s return on equity (ROE) is 10.5%. The historical average is -7.2%.
Based on historical data, Galapagos N.V. is trading at a P/E of 5.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Galapagos N.V. has 97.3% gross margin and 45.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Galapagos N.V.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.