Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $67M | $6M | $126M | $343M | $2.1B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $224M | $163M | $306M | $452M | $2.1B | $2.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.08 | 0.27 | 2.76 | 7.19 | 78.56 | 683.77 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | 4.03 | 35.29 | 69.01 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.55 | 6.71 | 9.48 | 77.83 | 678.91 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -461.2% | -461.2% | 6.2% | 13.5% | -32.2% | -112.9% |
| Operating Margin | -640.1% | -640.1% | -572.3% | -345.4% | -2418.7% | -1811.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -807.2% | -807.2% | -647.0% | -401.9% | -2929.2% | -2060.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | -266.3% | -1627.7% | -207.9% |
| ROA | -114.1% | -114.1% | -90.4% | -51.3% | -342.4% | -88.0% |
| ROIC | — | — | -164.1% | -105.7% | -1656.4% | — |
| ROCE | — | — | -501.7% | -65.2% | -335.7% | -95.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 1.33 | 0.20 | 0.04 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 1.28 | -0.33 | -0.49 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -8.38 | -8.38 | -7.91 | -5.44 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.91 | 3.54 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.91 | 3.54 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.57 | 1.18 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.61 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 39.42 | 24.97 | 22.37 | 56.60 | 214.31 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $18M | $13M | $11M | $9M | $11M |
Imminent insolvency and liquidity
According to current market data, Triller Group trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 3.65, a multiple that appears disconnected from the company's 52.53% year-over-year revenue contraction and the absence of positive earnings, suggesting that the market is pricing in speculative recovery rather than fundamental performance.
The lack of a meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA multiple highlights the firm's status as a distressed asset rather than a growth-stage technology company. Investors should monitor whether the valuation remains supported by the recent AGBA merger or if the market will eventually apply a significant discount to account for the persistent negative margins.
Based on reported financial statements, Triller Group's gross margin profile has frequently dipped into negative territory, including a -23.8% reading in 2025Q2, which indicates that the cost of content acquisition and platform hosting currently exceeds the revenue generated from the company's core user base.
This structural inability to achieve positive gross margins suggests that the current business model may not be scalable without a fundamental shift in content licensing or monetization strategy. The operating margins, which have reached as low as -100.3%, further imply that administrative and marketing overheads are exacerbating the losses from core operations.
As reported in quarterly filings, the company's asset turnover ratio remains extremely low at 0.11 as of 2026Q1, indicating that Triller Group is struggling to generate meaningful revenue from its existing asset base compared to industry peers who typically maintain significantly higher capital efficiency.
The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle and the high days payable outstanding suggest that the firm may be relying on extended payment terms to manage its severe liquidity constraints. This reliance on supplier leverage appears unsustainable and warrants further investigation into the company's ability to maintain vendor relationships.
According to the most recent balance sheet, Triller Group maintains a current ratio of only 0.04, with cash reserves dwindling to $2.29M, a figure that provides an extremely thin buffer against the company's ongoing operational cash burn and suggests an imminent need for external financing.
The current liquidity position is highly vulnerable to even minor operational disruptions or unexpected increases in content costs. Investors should monitor the company's ability to secure additional capital, as the current cash position appears insufficient to sustain operations without significant dilution or debt restructuring.
The price-to-sales ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for Triller Group, as it fails to account for the company's negative gross margins and the high cost of revenue associated with its content-heavy business model, thereby masking the true economic cost of each dollar of revenue generated.
Instead of relying on P/S, analysts should focus on the contribution margin or the ratio of cash burn to revenue to better understand the firm's underlying economic health. Using revenue multiples in this context risks overstating the value of a business that currently consumes more capital than it produces.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ILLR stock.
Triller Group Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Triller Group Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Triller Group Inc. has -461.2% gross margin and -640.1% operating margin.