Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 5.4x · EV/EBITDA 4.8x · ROE 28.1%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $881M | $560M | $666M | $545M | $580M | $310M | $13M | $5M | $10M | $8M | $4M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.1B | $797M | $930M | $891M | $627M | $369M | $12M | $2M | $7M | $8M | $7M |
| P/E Ratio → | 5.35 | 3.48 | 7.49 | 4.88 | 4.91 | — | — | — | 6.44 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.25 | 1.43 | 1.62 | 1.45 | 1.80 | 2.05 | 4.35 | 1.06 | 1.72 | 1.53 | 0.91 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.36 | 0.88 | 1.30 | 1.29 | 1.74 | 1.30 | 4.87 | 0.82 | 1.49 | 1.56 | 1.30 |
| P/FCF | 10.22 | 6.49 | 5.73 | 8.27 | 13.79 | 12.09 | — | — | 33.77 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 4.15 | 2.63 | 2.71 | 2.63 | 3.40 | 3.60 | — | 23.09 | 7.55 | 52.37 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.03 | 2.27 | 2.38 | 1.95 | 2.44 | 3.88 | 0.47 | 1.21 | 1.51 | 1.43 |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.77 | 3.40 | 4.07 | 3.53 | 2.66 | 4.29 | — | 10.93 | 6.87 | 50.13 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 7.92 | 3.31 | 6.26 | 5.09 | 4.16 | — | — | — | 16.52 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 9.24 | 8.00 | 13.53 | 14.92 | 14.41 | — | — | 23.76 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 46.4% | 46.4% | 57.1% | 58.9% | 73.8% | 62.2% | -23.4% | 16.2% | 25.3% | 7.7% | 2.4% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 36.0% | 37.5% | 50.0% | 63.3% | 39.6% | -125.6% | -10.3% | 4.1% | -14.5% | -87.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 41.0% | 41.0% | 21.7% | 29.8% | 36.7% | -43.5% | -120.1% | -8.9% | 26.7% | -10.9% | -89.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 28.1% | 28.1% | 19.1% | 29.6% | 41.3% | -54.6% | -80.5% | -6.6% | 26.3% | -13.6% | -78.2% |
| ROA | 14.9% | 14.9% | 9.2% | 15.3% | 25.9% | -32.7% | -51.0% | -4.7% | 17.8% | -6.9% | -40.9% |
| ROIC | 12.9% | 12.9% | 14.9% | 24.5% | 45.0% | 30.1% | -121.6% | -10.5% | 4.1% | -10.6% | -43.5% |
| ROCE | 15.0% | 15.0% | 17.8% | 29.1% | 52.8% | 35.5% | -58.4% | -5.9% | 2.9% | -10.0% | -44.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.54 | 0.86 | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.76 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.21 | 1.43 | 0.26 | 0.79 | — | 0.68 | 0.12 | 0.57 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.37 | 0.52 | 0.82 | 0.14 | 0.25 | -0.53 | -0.46 | -0.44 | -0.02 | 0.74 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.16 | 1.37 | 0.20 | 0.69 | — | -13.80 | -2.89 | -0.60 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.75 | 2.27 | 5.26 | 1.13 | 2.31 | — | — | -10.00 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 7.52 | 7.52 | 4.22 | 6.05 | — | -8.18 | -364.00 | -45.40 | 86.00 | -14.43 | -40.18 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.49 | 3.87 | 7.01 | 7.93 | 2.45 | 2.04 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 3.27 | 6.33 | 7.09 | 1.56 | 1.25 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 2.60 | 5.01 | 5.68 | 0.30 | 0.10 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.34 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.62 | 0.38 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.55 |
| Inventory Turnover | 26.50 | 26.50 | 30.72 | 24.96 | 9.49 | 73.21 | 10.38 | 9.91 | 9.45 | 8.98 | 7.27 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 38.22 | 39.52 | 34.19 | 28.99 | 43.50 | 35.32 | 41.40 | 33.14 | 35.85 | 38.28 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.9% | 6.0% | 4.6% | 5.1% | 4.3% | 5.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 20.7% | 20.7% | 34.7% | 24.8% | 21.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 18.7% | 28.8% | 13.3% | 20.5% | 20.4% | — | — | — | 15.5% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 9.8% | 15.4% | 17.5% | 12.1% | 7.2% | 8.3% | — | — | 3.0% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.2% | 6.5% | 4.6% | 5.1% | 4.3% | 6.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $21M | $21M | $20M | $20M | $16M | $887611 | $887611 | $885677 | $840098 | $507583 |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying REPX stock.
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 5.4x. The historical average is 9.0x. This places it at the 30th percentile of its historical range.
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 4.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.9x.
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 28.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -19.2%.
Based on historical data, Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 5.4x. This is at the 30th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 3.87% with a payout ratio of 20.7%.
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. has 46.4% gross margin and 36.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Volatile earnings from commodity swings
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Deep Value Pricing Amid Accelerating Growth
REPX trades at a forward EV/EBITDA of 1.87, a stark discount to the peer average of 4.20, implying the market is either pricing in severe commodity risk or missing the recent acceleration in operational scale.
The current P/E of 5.04 and P/B of 1.28 suggest the equity is priced for minimal growth or permanent impairment. However, the company's 94.2% year-over-year revenue acceleration and 75.4% gross margin in 2026Q2 create a significant disconnect. The valuation appears to ignore the company's demonstrated ability to generate high returns on capital in a favorable commodity environment.
Margin Outperformance Masks Commodity Sensitivity
REPX's 52.6% operating margin in 2026Q2 significantly outperforms the peer average of ~20%, but this level of profitability appears more reflective of a temporary favorable commodity spread than a permanent structural advantage.
The dramatic expansion from a 29.0% operating margin in 2025Q4 highlights the direct linkage to oil and gas prices. The 75.4% gross margin is more than double the next closest peer, Civitas, and warrants caution. This level of profitability is likely unsustainable through a full commodity price cycle, and the net margin's historical volatility underscores the core earnings risk.
ROIC Surges but Quality is Questionable
Based on reported figures, ROIC rebounded to 7.9% in 2026Q2 from a low of 1.6% in 2024Q3, yet this improvement is volatile and appears driven more by commodity price winds than by sustained capital efficiency gains.
The erratic ROIC path, swinging between 1.6% and 7.9% over two years, indicates that returns are not yet compounding predictably. This volatility suggests the company's capital deployment is highly sensitive to the external price environment. Investors should monitor whether the recent improvement can be stabilized through operational efficiency, as opposed to being solely a function of higher realized oil prices.
Supplier Leverage Masks Tight Customer Collections
As reported in financial statements, REPX's negative cash conversion cycle of -9 days in 2026Q2 is primarily driven by an extended 62-day payment period to suppliers (DPO), while collections from customers (DSO) remain within a normal 35-day range.
This negative CCC is a positive liquidity lever, effectively allowing the company to use supplier credit to fund operations. However, the wide swings in DPO, from 14 days in 2025Q4 to 62 days in 2026Q2, suggest this may be a tactical management of payables rather than a consistent structural advantage. The trend should be monitored to see if it represents sustainable working capital management.
Improved Leverage but Volatile Debt Profile
The D/E ratio improved to 0.42 in 2026Q2 from a peak of 0.80 in 2024Q1, but the erratic pattern in total debt suggests balance sheet metrics are heavily influenced by acquisition timing rather than consistent operational deleveraging.
The significant drop in total debt from $374.9M in 2025Q3 to $267.5M in 2026Q2 indicates a rapid deleveraging phase. However, the D/EBITDA ratio of 2.39 remains meaningful, and the prior swing to 7.72 shows the leverage profile can deteriorate quickly with operational or acquisition-related moves. The improved interest coverage of 7.55 is positive but appears to be a recent development.
Gross Margin is the Most Misleading Metric
The 75.4% gross margin, while eye-catching, is the ratio most commonly misapplied to this E&P business model as it obscures the primary driver of value: reserve replacement cost and long-term well economics.
For exploration and production companies, gross margin is a snapshot of current commodity prices relative to lifting costs and does not account for the capital required to replace reserves or the volatility in the price of the underlying commodity. A better metric for assessing underlying health is finding and development (F&D) cost per barrel or maintenance capital as a percentage of cash flow, which are not provided in the data. Focusing on the current gross margin could lead investors to overpay for a cyclical peak.