Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 30.5x · EV/EBITDA 14.4x · ROE 10.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $537M | $544M | $515M | $597M | $658M | $819M | $885M | $1.6B | $842M | $1.0B | $883M |
| Enterprise Value | $916M | $923M | $887M | $960M | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.9B | $1.1B | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 30.46 | 30.87 | 26.77 | 38.96 | 31.20 | 7.51 | 45.58 | 85.04 | 34.87 | 22.42 | 51.24 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.41 | 5.48 | 5.20 | 6.25 | 7.27 | 9.73 | 11.34 | 20.92 | 11.05 | 14.15 | 13.17 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.52 | 3.57 | 2.87 | 2.97 | 2.87 | 3.48 | 5.56 | 8.88 | 1.85 | 2.21 | 1.76 |
| P/FCF | 10.93 | 11.07 | 10.98 | 13.74 | 19.84 | 23.59 | 21.09 | 42.98 | 21.66 | 27.68 | — |
| P/OCF | 10.93 | 11.07 | 10.98 | 13.74 | 14.07 | 17.17 | 20.01 | 37.84 | 19.62 | 22.24 | 21.69 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 9.30 | 8.96 | 10.04 | 11.09 | 13.51 | 15.16 | 24.50 | 14.41 | 17.64 | 17.82 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.40 | 14.51 | 13.81 | 16.24 | 17.56 | 20.18 | 22.93 | 36.62 | 21.25 | 25.97 | 26.49 |
| EV / EBIT | 26.35 | 23.84 | 20.60 | 25.64 | 31.55 | 9.64 | 42.69 | 64.09 | 32.44 | 22.92 | 44.98 |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.80 | 18.91 | 22.07 | 30.29 | 32.74 | 28.20 | 50.35 | 28.25 | 34.53 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 94.4% | 94.4% | 94.5% | 94.4% | 94.4% | 94.8% | 94.7% | 94.8% | 95.0% | 95.1% | 95.1% |
| Operating Margin | 35.0% | 35.0% | 37.2% | 32.8% | 33.8% | 34.3% | 33.3% | 33.4% | 35.0% | 33.2% | 33.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 17.8% | 17.8% | 19.4% | 16.1% | 23.3% | 129.7% | 24.9% | 24.6% | 31.7% | 63.1% | 25.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.6% | 10.6% | 10.1% | 7.2% | 9.1% | 55.4% | 11.4% | 6.0% | 5.3% | 9.4% | 4.9% |
| ROA | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | 2.6% | 3.5% | 20.0% | 4.0% | 3.9% | 5.0% | 9.0% | 3.5% |
| ROIC | 4.8% | 4.8% | 5.0% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 3.3% | 2.8% | 2.4% | 2.6% |
| ROCE | 8.9% | 8.9% | 15.4% | 11.4% | 10.1% | 10.5% | 10.4% | 9.6% | 9.3% | 7.9% | 7.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.53 | 2.53 | 2.11 | 1.84 | 1.55 | 1.45 | 1.91 | 1.56 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.63 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.07 | 6.07 | 5.90 | 6.27 | 6.19 | 6.04 | 5.89 | 5.48 | 5.06 | 5.22 | 7.00 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.49 | 2.07 | 1.80 | 1.51 | 1.35 | 1.88 | 1.52 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.62 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.96 | 5.96 | 5.79 | 6.13 | 6.06 | 5.64 | 5.78 | 5.36 | 4.96 | 5.15 | 6.91 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 7.73 | 7.93 | 8.33 | 10.45 | 9.15 | 7.11 | 7.36 | 6.59 | 6.84 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.81 | 1.70 | 2.96 | 13.39 | 3.35 | 2.80 | 3.50 | 5.53 | 2.84 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 15.19 | 15.19 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
| Quick Ratio | 15.19 | 15.19 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 2.39 | 2.59 | 2.51 |
| Cash Ratio | 5.07 | 5.07 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 7.7% | 7.5% | 7.8% | 6.7% | 5.9% | 4.7% | 4.3% | 2.3% | 4.4% | 3.5% | 4.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 233.0% | 233.0% | 210.0% | 258.2% | 185.7% | 35.3% | 195.3% | 197.3% | 152.2% | 79.0% | 204.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.3% | 3.2% | 3.7% | 2.6% | 3.2% | 13.3% | 2.2% | 1.2% | 2.9% | 4.5% | 2.0% |
| FCF Yield | 9.1% | 9.0% | 9.1% | 7.3% | 5.0% | 4.2% | 4.7% | 2.3% | 4.6% | 3.6% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.7% | 7.5% | 7.9% | 6.7% | 5.9% | 4.7% | 4.3% | 2.3% | 4.4% | 3.5% | 4.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $14M | $14M | $14M | $14M | $14M | $14M | $14M | $14M | $14M | $13M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying UHT stock.
Universal Health Realty Income Trust's current P/E ratio is 30.5x. The historical average is 24.6x. This places it at the 67th percentile of its historical range.
Universal Health Realty Income Trust's current EV/EBITDA is 14.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 19.4x.
Universal Health Realty Income Trust's return on equity (ROE) is 10.6%. The historical average is 14.9%.
Based on historical data, Universal Health Realty Income Trust is trading at a P/E of 30.5x. This is at the 67th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Universal Health Realty Income Trust's current dividend yield is 7.65% with a payout ratio of 233.0%.
Universal Health Realty Income Trust has 94.4% gross margin and 35.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Universal Health Realty Income Trust's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage rising on shrinking equity base
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Valuation Discount Amidst Margin Collapse
UHT trades at a P/FFO of 10.37, a significant discount to its historical average above 12, yet this multiple appears elevated given the severe 2026Q2 NOI margin compression to 8.7% reported in recent financial statements.
The current P/FFO multiple suggests the market is pricing in a recovery from the recent margin shock, but the implied cap rate (NOI/EV) is likely distorted by the same operational anomaly. Investors should compare this to private market transaction cap rates for stabilized healthcare facilities, which typically range from 5-7%, to gauge if the equity valuation adequately compensates for the balance sheet risk.
NOI Margin Collapse Signals Operational Shock
UHT's NOI margin plummeted to 8.7% in 2026Q2 from a consistent 94%+ in prior quarters, a catastrophic deterioration that suggests a major shift in expense recognition or reimbursement structures, as reported in the company's financial statements.
This collapse is the single most critical development, as it fundamentally undermines the REIT's core earnings power and the sustainability of its dividend. The prior 94% margin was already an outlier for the sector, and this sudden normalization to single digits indicates the prior profitability profile may not have reflected true economic cash flow, a risk highlighted in prior analysis.
Payout Ratio Masks Underlying Cash Strain
The FFO payout ratio of 81.3% in 2026Q2 appears manageable in isolation, but the complete absence of AFFO data for ten quarters makes it impossible to assess the true cash flow available for distribution after maintenance capital expenditures.
The dividend yield of 7.2% is attractive only if the payout is sustainable. Given the reported $0 in capital expenditures, the FFO payout may overstate safety, as it ignores potential hidden maintenance costs. The declining equity base suggests the dividend is being funded partly by debt, a practice that warrants close monitoring for long-term viability.
Leverage Escalates on Contracting Equity
UHT's debt-to-equity ratio has climbed to 2.75 as of 2026Q2, driven by a 26.8% decline in shareholder equity over ten quarters, indicating a capital structure increasingly reliant on debt financing, according to recent SEC filings.
The rising leverage ratio is a direct consequence of the equity erosion, likely from sustained dividend payments exceeding retained earnings. With a cash balance of only $6.8M against $395.1M in debt, the company has minimal liquidity to absorb operational shocks or manage upcoming debt maturities without accessing capital markets, which could be challenging given the current margin volatility.
Margin Volatility Exposes Portfolio Risk
The extreme volatility in NOI margin, from 94.4% to 8.7% in a single quarter, suggests significant concentration risk in tenant reimbursement structures or property-level expense management within UHT's healthcare facility portfolio.
Such a dramatic swing implies the portfolio may be heavily exposed to a small number of operators or specific reimbursement models that are subject to sudden change. This level of volatility is atypical for a diversified healthcare REIT and indicates that the portfolio's quality and stability may be lower than the historical margin profile suggested.
The Misleading 94% NOI Margin
The most commonly misapplied metric is UHT's historical 94% NOI margin, which appears to be an accounting artifact that obscures the true, much lower, property-level profitability and cash flow generation of the portfolio.
This margin level is inconsistent with the economics of owning and leasing healthcare facilities, where significant operating expenses are standard. It likely reflects a non-standard accounting treatment where most expenses are borne by tenants or capitalized elsewhere. The correct metric to use is the FFO payout ratio and the trend in FFO per share, but even these must be scrutinized given the recent margin collapse and the absence of AFFO data to confirm cash flow sustainability.