Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AACG vs FEDU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
AACG vs FEDU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $19M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $267M | $251M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-48M | $801K |
| Gross Margin | 48.6% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | -11.4% | -6.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $46M | $98M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $211M |
AACG vs FEDU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATA Creativity Glob… (AACG) | 100 | 132.2 | +32.2% |
| Four Seasons Educat… (FEDU) | 100 | 43.9 | -56.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AACG vs FEDU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AACG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.74
- Rev growth -2.7%, EPS growth -27.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- -59.1% 10Y total return vs FEDU's -88.5%
FEDU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 19.5%, current ratio 2.19x
- Beta 0.29, yield 100.0%, current ratio 2.19x
- 100.1% revenue growth vs AACG's -2.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.1% revenue growth vs AACG's -2.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs AACG's -17.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs AACG's 1.74, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.0% vs AACG's +32.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs AACG's -10.8%, ROIC -3.0% vs -62.4% |
AACG vs FEDU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AACG vs FEDU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AACG and FEDU each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AACG and FEDU operate at a comparable scale, with $267M and $251M in trailing revenue. FEDU is the more profitable business, keeping 0.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AACG's -17.9%. On growth, FEDU holds the edge at +83.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $267M | $251M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$48M | $801,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.6% | +18.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | -6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.9% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | -14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.9% | +83.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | -12.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FEDU leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | -$14M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.75x | 18.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 0.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.01x | 0.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FEDU leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FEDU delivers a 0.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-90 for AACG. FEDU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AACG's 1.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FEDU scores 5/9 vs AACG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -89.5% | +0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.8% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -62.4% | -3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.6% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.44x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$39M | -$112M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $211M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $46M | $98M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FEDU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FEDU five years ago would be worth $5,921 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,089 for AACG. Over the past 12 months, FEDU leads with a +38.0% total return vs AACG's +32.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FEDU at 9.3% vs AACG's -13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.8% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.2% | +38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.6% | +30.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.1% | -40.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.1% | -88.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.2% | +9.3% |
Risk & Volatility
FEDU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FEDU is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AACG's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FEDU currently trades 60.6% from its 52-week high vs AACG's 46.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.74x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.58 | $17.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $6.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.1% | +60.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 1K |
Analyst Outlook
AACG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
FEDU is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $164.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FEDU leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AACG leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
AACG vs FEDU: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AACG or FEDU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the stronger pick with 100. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 7% for ATA Creativity Global (AACG). Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. (FEDU) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. (FEDU) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AACG or FEDU?
Over the past 5 years, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) delivered a total return of -40. 8%, compared to -59. 1% for ATA Creativity Global (AACG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AACG returned -59. 1% versus FEDU's -88. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AACG or FEDU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus ATA Creativity Global's 1. 74β — meaning AACG is approximately 503% more volatile than FEDU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. (FEDU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 144% for ATA Creativity Global — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AACG or FEDU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is pulling ahead at 100. 1% versus -2. 7% for ATA Creativity Global (AACG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ATA Creativity Global grew EPS -27. 8% year-over-year, compared to -81. 9% for Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AACG leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AACG or FEDU?
Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 3% net margin versus -17. 9% for ATA Creativity Global — meaning it keeps 0. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FEDU leads at -6. 3% versus -11. 3% for AACG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AACG leads at 48. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AACG or FEDU?
In this comparison, FEDU (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. AACG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is AACG or FEDU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 100. 0% yield). ATA Creativity Global (AACG) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FEDU: -88. 5%, AACG: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AACG and FEDU?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AACG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FEDU is a small-cap high-growth stock. FEDU pays a dividend while AACG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 41%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.