Business Equipment & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ACCO vs HRB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Personal Products & Services
ACCO vs HRB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Business Equipment & Supplies | Personal Products & Services |
| Market Cap | $371M | $3.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.55B | $3.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $74M | $614M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | 25.2% |
| Forward P/E | 4.8x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $921M | $2.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $983M |
ACCO vs HRB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCO Brands Corpora… (ACCO) | 100 | 64.9 | -35.1% |
| H&R Block, Inc. (HRB) | 100 | 176.6 | +76.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACCO vs HRB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACCO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, current ratio 1.61x
- Beta 1.33, yield 7.1%, current ratio 1.61x
- Lower P/E (4.8x vs 6.0x)
HRB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 4.8%
- Rev growth 4.2%, EPS growth 6.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
- 107.2% 10Y total return vs ACCO's -35.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.2% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.8x vs 6.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.2% margin vs ACCO's 4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs ACCO's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, vs HRB's 4.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.9% vs HRB's -48.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.9% ROA vs ACCO's 3.2%, ROIC 58.3% vs 5.5% |
ACCO vs HRB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACCO vs HRB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.8B annually — 2.4x ACCO's $1.6B. HRB is the more profitable business, keeping 16.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACCO's 4.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $177M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $74M | $614M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $49M | $524M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +25.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +16.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +13.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | -6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ACCO and HRB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.8x trailing earnings, HRB trades at a 25% valuation discount to ACCO's 9.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HRB's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACCO's 6.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $371M | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.14x | 6.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.79x | 6.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.78x | 5.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.24x | 1.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.57x | 46.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.30x | 6.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRB delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $11 for ACCO. ACCO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRB's 22.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACCO scores 7/9 vs HRB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.3% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +20.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +58.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +39.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.39x | 22.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $856M | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $983M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $921M | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.50x | 10.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRB five years ago would be worth $16,009 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,098 for ACCO. Over the past 12 months, ACCO leads with a +24.9% total return vs HRB's -48.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRB at 1.9% vs ACCO's -1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.0% | -28.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.9% | -48.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.7% | +6.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.0% | +60.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.1% | +107.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.3% | +1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACCO and HRB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HRB is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACCO's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACCO currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs HRB's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.29 | $64.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.81 | $28.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.7% | +46.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.7 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACCO and HRB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ACCO as "Hold" and HRB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for ACCO (target: $8) vs 36.5% for HRB (target: $41). For income investors, ACCO offers the higher dividend yield at 7.15% vs HRB's 4.78%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $41.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.1% | +4.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $1.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +11.5% |
HRB leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
ACCO vs HRB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACCO or HRB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the stronger pick with 4. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). H&R Block, Inc. (HRB) offers the better valuation at 6. 8x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACCO or HRB?
On trailing P/E, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the cheapest at 6. 8x versus ACCO Brands Corporation at 9. 1x. On forward P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACCO or HRB?
Over the past 5 years, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) delivered a total return of +60. 1%, compared to -39. 0% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HRB returned +107. 2% versus ACCO's -35. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACCO or HRB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus ACCO Brands Corporation's 1. 33β — meaning ACCO is approximately 5655% more volatile than HRB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 139% versus 23% for H&R Block, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACCO or HRB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is pulling ahead at 4. 2% versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACCO Brands Corporation grew EPS 141. 5% year-over-year, compared to 6. 6% for H&R Block, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HRB leads at 2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACCO or HRB?
H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus 2. 7% for ACCO Brands Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HRB leads at 22. 0% versus 7. 1% for ACCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HRB leads at 44. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACCO or HRB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) trades at 4.
8x forward P/E versus 6. 0x for H&R Block, Inc. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACCO: 99. 0% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACCO or HRB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 4. 8% for H&R Block, Inc. (HRB).
09Is ACCO or HRB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, H&R Block, Inc.
(HRB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 02), 4. 8% yield, +107. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HRB: +107. 2%, ACCO: -35. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACCO and HRB?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACCO (Industrials) and HRB (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.