Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
ACLX vs LEGN vs KYMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ACLX vs LEGN vs KYMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $6.73B | $5.19B | $7.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $1.03B | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-229M | $-297M | $-315M |
| Gross Margin | -64.8% | 60.3% | 33.2% |
| Operating Margin | -11.4% | -13.2% | -7.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 116.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $96M | $414M | $82M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $80M | $902M | $357M |
ACLX vs LEGN vs KYMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX) | 100 | 601.2 | +501.2% |
| Legend Biotech Corp… (LEGN) | 100 | 45.7 | -54.3% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 209.5 | +109.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACLX vs LEGN vs KYMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACLX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 158.8%
LEGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.76
- Rev growth 64.5%, EPS growth -66.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.6%
- 64.5% revenue growth vs ACLX's -79.4%
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 10.47x
- +179.8% vs LEGN's -12.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.5% revenue growth vs ACLX's -79.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | -28.8% margin vs ACLX's -10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs KYMR's 1.03 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +179.8% vs LEGN's -12.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -17.6% ROA vs ACLX's -36.2%, ROIC -12.7% vs -46.2% |
ACLX vs LEGN vs KYMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ACLX vs LEGN vs KYMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LEGN leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACLX leads 1 • KYMR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEGN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 46.2x ACLX's $22M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -28.8% (LEGN) to -10.3% (ACLX). On growth, LEGN holds the edge at +64.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $1.0B | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$246M | -$107M | -$352M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$229M | -$297M | -$315M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$213M | -$231M | -$244M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -64.8% | +60.3% | +33.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | -13.2% | -7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | -28.8% | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | -22.4% | -4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -89.2% | +64.9% | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.6% | -2.2% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
LEGN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.7B | $5.2B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.7B | $4.7B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -28.27x | -8.73x | -23.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 116.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 302.09x | 5.03x | 179.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.10x | 2.59x | 4.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LEGN and KYMR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR delivers a -25.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-55 for ACLX. KYMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LEGN's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KYMR scores 4/9 vs ACLX's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.4% | -29.2% | -25.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -36.2% | -17.6% | -22.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -46.2% | -12.7% | -24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -46.6% | -11.0% | -27.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.41x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16M | -$488M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $80M | $902M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $96M | $414M | $82M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.45x | -12.69x | -2119.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ACLX and KYMR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACLX five years ago would be worth $68,494 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,584 for LEGN. Over the past 12 months, KYMR leads with a +179.8% total return vs LEGN's -12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 45.9% vs LEGN's -25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +81.7% | +30.7% | +18.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +104.5% | -12.2% | +179.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.2% | -59.1% | +210.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +584.9% | -4.2% | +95.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +584.9% | -24.0% | +158.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.6% | -25.8% | +45.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ACLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACLX is the less volatile stock with a -0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KYMR's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACLX currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs LEGN's 62.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.49x | 0.76x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $115.13 | $45.30 | $103.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $50.85 | $16.24 | $28.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +62.1% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.9 | 74.8 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.9M | 583K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACLX as "Hold", LEGN as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 105.9% upside for LEGN (target: $58) vs -2.3% for ACLX (target: $112).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $112.45 | $57.89 | $118.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 19 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LEGN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACLX leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
ACLX vs LEGN vs KYMR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACLX or LEGN or KYMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is the stronger pick with 64.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). Analysts rate Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ACLX or LEGN or KYMR?
Over the past 5 years, Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) delivered a total return of +584. 9%, compared to -4. 2% for Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACLX returned +584. 9% versus LEGN's -24. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ACLX or LEGN or KYMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 49β versus Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 03β — meaning KYMR is approximately -310% more volatile than ACLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 41% for Legend Biotech Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ACLX or LEGN or KYMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is pulling ahead at 64.
5% versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS -23. 8% year-over-year, compared to -103. 5% for Arcellx, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEGN leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ACLX or LEGN or KYMR?
Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is the more profitable company, earning -28.
8% net margin versus -1027. 3% for Arcellx, Inc. — meaning it keeps -28. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LEGN leads at -13. 3% versus -1135. 6% for ACLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ACLX or LEGN or KYMR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LEGN: 105.
9% to $57. 89.
07Which pays a better dividend — ACLX or LEGN or KYMR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ACLX or LEGN or KYMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arcellx, Inc.
(ACLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 49), +584. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACLX: +584. 9%, KYMR: +158. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ACLX and LEGN and KYMR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ACLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.