ADAG
Adagene Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$210M
5Y Perf.-85.4%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisADAG
BCAB
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ADAG vs BCAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BCAB
BioAtla, Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-99.9%
ADAG vs BCAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  ADAG |  BCAB |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $210M | $5M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $103K | $2M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-55M | $-51M |
| Gross Margin | -10.9% | 106.0% |
| Operating Margin | -589.5% | -25.2% |
| Total Debt | $18M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $7M |
ADAG vs BCAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ADAG
BCAB
| Stock | Feb 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adagene Inc. (ADAG) | 100 | 14.6 | -85.4% |
| BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADAG vs BCAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BCAB leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Adagene Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇BCAB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ADAG
Adagene Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
ADAG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -88.1% 10Y total return vs BCAB's -99.8%
- +82.1% vs BCAB's -82.0%
- -83.3% ROA vs BCAB's -309.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
BCAB
BioAtla, Inc.
The Income Pick
BCAB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.25
- Rev growth -81.8%, EPS growth 29.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, current ratio 0.37x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  BCAB | -81.8% revenue growth vs ADAG's -99.4% |
| Quality / Margins | BCAB | -25.3% margin vs ADAG's -537.2% |
| Stability / Safety | BCAB | Beta 0.25 vs ADAG's 0.73 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) |  ADAG | +82.1% vs BCAB's -82.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ADAG | -83.3% ROA vs BCAB's -309.4% |
ADAG vs BCAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2020
Segment breakdown not available.
ADAG vs BCAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLADAGLAGGINGBCAB
BCABBioAtla, Inc.
1leads
ADAGAdagene Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BCABMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BCAB5/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ADAG3/5
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ADAG6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCAB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $2M annually — 19.4x ADAG's $103,204. BCAB is the more profitable business, keeping -25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ADAG's -537.2%.
| Metric | ADAGAdagene Inc. | BCABBioAtla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $103,204 | $2M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$59M | -$51M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$55M | -$51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$48M | -$23M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | +106.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -589.5% | -25.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -537.2% | -25.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -461.1% | -11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | +67.5% |
BCAB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ADAG and BCAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ADAGAdagene Inc. | BCABBioAtla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $210M | $5M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $144M | $4M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.76x | -0.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2037.00x | 2.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.55x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — ADAG and BCAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADAG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BCAB scores 2/9 vs ADAG's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ADAGAdagene Inc. | BCABBioAtla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -146.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -83.3% | -3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.1% | -4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$67M | -$918,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -46.92x | — |
ADAG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADAG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADAG five years ago would be worth $2,627 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19 for BCAB. Over the past 12 months, ADAG leads with a +82.1% total return vs BCAB's -82.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADAG at 42.3% vs BCAB's -72.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ADAGAdagene Inc. | BCABBioAtla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +94.0% | -85.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +82.1% | -82.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +187.9% | -97.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.7% | -99.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.1% | -99.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.3% | -72.6% |
ADAG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ADAG and BCAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BCAB is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ADAG's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADAG currently trades 75.2% from its 52-week high vs BCAB's 5.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ADAGAdagene Inc. | BCABBioAtla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.75 | $71.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.30 | $0.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.2% | +5.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.9 | 41.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 214K | 45K |
Evenly matched — ADAG and BCAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ADAG as "Buy" and BCAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6376.7% upside for BCAB (target: $250) vs 40.1% for ADAG (target: $5).
| Metric | ADAGAdagene Inc. | BCABBioAtla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | $250.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ADAG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BCAB leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
Best OverallAdagene Inc. (ADAG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ADAG vs BCAB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADAG or BCAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BioAtla, Inc.
(BCAB) is the stronger pick with -81. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 4% for Adagene Inc. (ADAG). Analysts rate Adagene Inc. (ADAG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ADAG or BCAB?
Over the past 5 years, Adagene Inc.
(ADAG) delivered a total return of -73. 7%, compared to -99. 8% for BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADAG returned -88. 1% versus BCAB's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ADAG or BCAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioAtla, Inc.
(BCAB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus Adagene Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning ADAG is approximately 187% more volatile than BCAB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ADAG or BCAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BioAtla, Inc.
(BCAB) is pulling ahead at -81. 8% versus -99. 4% for Adagene Inc. (ADAG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BioAtla, Inc. grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -75. 9% for Adagene Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ADAG or BCAB?
BioAtla, Inc.
(BCAB) is the more profitable company, earning -29. 8% net margin versus -323. 9% for Adagene Inc. — meaning it keeps -29. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCAB leads at -29. 7% versus -348. 4% for ADAG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCAB leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ADAG or BCAB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ADAG or BCAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BioAtla, Inc.
(BCAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 25)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCAB: -99. 8%, ADAG: -88. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ADAG and BCAB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.