Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ADCT vs RCUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ADCT vs RCUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $478M | $2.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $79M | $236M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-137M | $-369M |
| Gross Margin | 90.7% | 90.7% |
| Operating Margin | -149.6% | -168.6% |
| Total Debt | $439M | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $261M | $222M |
ADCT vs RCUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADC Therapeutics S.… (ADCT) | 100 | 10.2 | -89.8% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADCT vs RCUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADCT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.89
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -27.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.89, current ratio 4.37x
RCUS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 45.9% 10Y total return vs ADCT's -87.3%
- -156.4% margin vs ADCT's -173.0%
- +209.6% vs ADCT's +196.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs RCUS's -4.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -156.4% margin vs ADCT's -173.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.89 vs RCUS's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs ADCT's +196.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -35.3% ROA vs ADCT's -44.7% |
ADCT vs RCUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ADCT vs RCUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADCT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS is the larger business by revenue, generating $236M annually — 3.0x ADCT's $79M. RCUS is the more profitable business, keeping -156.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ADCT's -173.0%. On growth, ADCT holds the edge at -9.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $79M | $236M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$117M | -$391M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$137M | -$369M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$115M | -$489M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.7% | +90.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -149.6% | -168.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -173.0% | -156.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -144.7% | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.5% | -39.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.7% | +10.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ADCT and RCUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $478M | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $656M | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.36x | -7.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.88x | 10.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCUS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADCT scores 4/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -69.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.7% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -64.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -43.8% | -42.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $178M | -$123M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $261M | $222M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $439M | $99M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.72x | -13.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ADCT and RCUS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCUS five years ago would be worth $8,143 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,594 for ADCT. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs ADCT's +196.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADCT at 21.0% vs RCUS's 7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.8% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +196.1% | +209.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.4% | +24.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.1% | -18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.3% | +45.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.0% | +7.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ADCT and RCUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADCT is the less volatile stock with a 1.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCUS currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs ADCT's 75.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.97 | $28.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.23 | $7.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.7% | +86.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.0 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 946K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ADCT as "Buy" and RCUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.5% upside for ADCT (target: $8) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.50 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ADCT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). RCUS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ADCT vs RCUS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADCT or RCUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ADC Therapeutics S.
A. (ADCT) is the stronger pick with 14. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Analysts rate ADC Therapeutics S. A. (ADCT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ADCT or RCUS?
Over the past 5 years, Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) delivered a total return of -18. 6%, compared to -84. 1% for ADC Therapeutics S. A. (ADCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCUS returned +45. 9% versus ADCT's -87. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ADCT or RCUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ADC Therapeutics S.
A. (ADCT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 89β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 4% more volatile than ADCT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ADCT or RCUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ADC Therapeutics S.
A. (ADCT) is pulling ahead at 14. 9% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ADC Therapeutics S. A. grew EPS 30. 9% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ADCT or RCUS?
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) is the more profitable company, earning -142. 9% net margin versus -175. 3% for ADC Therapeutics S. A. — meaning it keeps -142. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADCT leads at -133. 2% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ADCT or RCUS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ADCT or RCUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. ADC Therapeutics S. A. (ADCT) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCUS: +45. 9%, ADCT: -87. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ADCT and RCUS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.