Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ADT vs CSGP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ADT
ADT Inc.

Security & Protection Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.24B
5Y Perf.-1.4%
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14.44B
5Y Perf.-48.1%

ADT vs CSGP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ADT logoADT
CSGP logoCSGP
IndustrySecurity & Protection ServicesReal Estate - Services
Market Cap$5.24B$14.44B
Revenue (TTM)$5.14B$3.41B
Net Income (TTM)$623M$25M
Gross Margin50.4%77.4%
Operating Margin25.6%-0.8%
Forward P/E7.6x25.2x
Total Debt$7.69B$1.14B
Cash & Equiv.$81M$1.73B

ADT vs CSGPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ADT
CSGP
StockMay 20May 26Return
ADT Inc. (ADT)10098.6-1.4%
CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP)10051.9-48.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ADT vs CSGP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ADT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. CoStar Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ADT
ADT Inc.
The Value Play

ADT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (7.6x vs 25.2x)
  • 12.1% margin vs CSGP's 0.7%
  • 3.0% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: value and quality
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

CSGP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.80
  • Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth -95.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.2%
  • 74.0% 10Y total return vs ADT's -27.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCSGP logoCSGP18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs ADT's 4.7%
ValueADT logoADTLower P/E (7.6x vs 25.2x)
Quality / MarginsADT logoADT12.1% margin vs CSGP's 0.7%
Stability / SafetyCSGP logoCSGPBeta 0.80 vs ADT's 0.98, lower leverage
DividendsADT logoADT3.0% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ADT logoADT-12.3% vs CSGP's -54.3%
Efficiency (ROA)ADT logoADT3.9% ROA vs CSGP's 0.2%, ROIC 8.8% vs -0.9%

ADT vs CSGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ADTADT Inc.
FY 2025
Monitoring And Related Services
84.9%$4.4B
Security Installation, Product And Other
15.1%$775M
CSGPCoStar Group, Inc.
FY 2024
CoStar Suite
61.1%$1.0B
LoopNet
16.9%$282M
Information services
8.1%$136M
Online Marketplaces
7.8%$130M
Residential
6.0%$101M

ADT vs CSGP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLADTLAGGINGCSGP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ADT and CSGP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ADT is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 1.5x CSGP's $3.4B. ADT is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CSGP's 0.7%. On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricADT logoADTADT Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.1B$3.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.9B$278M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$623M$25M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.8B$241M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+50.4%+77.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+25.6%-0.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.1%+0.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+34.8%+7.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.9%+22.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+26.7%+127.7%
Evenly matched — ADT and CSGP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ADT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 10.4x trailing earnings, ADT trades at a 99% valuation discount to CSGP's 2052.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ADT's 4.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSGP's 81.5x.

MetricADT logoADTADT Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$5.2B$14.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$12.9B$13.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.42x2052.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.63x25.16x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.35x81.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.02x4.45x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.65x1.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.99x352.19x
ADT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ADT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ADT delivers a 16.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $0 for CSGP. CSGP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ADT's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADT scores 8/9 vs CSGP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricADT logoADTADT Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+16.7%+0.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.9%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.8%-0.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.0%-0.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–985
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.03x0.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$7.6B-$589M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$81M$1.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7.7B$1.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.23x1.58x
ADT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ADT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ADT five years ago would be worth $8,256 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,152 for CSGP. Over the past 12 months, ADT leads with a -12.3% total return vs CSGP's -54.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADT at 8.5% vs CSGP's -22.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricADT logoADTADT Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-12.2%-48.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-12.3%-54.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+27.6%-54.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-17.4%-58.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-27.2%+74.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.5%-22.9%
ADT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ADT and CSGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CSGP is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ADT's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADT currently trades 78.1% from its 52-week high vs CSGP's 35.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricADT logoADTADT Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.98x0.80x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.94$97.43
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.25$33.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.1%+35.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.333.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10.4M6.0M
Evenly matched — ADT and CSGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates ADT as "Buy" and CSGP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.7% upside for CSGP (target: $62) vs 28.5% for ADT (target: $9). ADT is the only dividend payer here at 2.99% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricADT logoADTADT Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.97$61.91
# AnalystsCovering analysts1725
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.21
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+11.6%+4.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ADT leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallADT Inc. (ADT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ADT vs CSGP: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ADT or CSGP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CoStar Group, Inc.

(CSGP) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for ADT Inc. (ADT). ADT Inc. (ADT) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ADT Inc. (ADT) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ADT or CSGP?

On trailing P/E, ADT Inc.

(ADT) is the cheapest at 10. 4x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 2052. 4x. On forward P/E, ADT Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ADT or CSGP?

Over the past 5 years, ADT Inc.

(ADT) delivered a total return of -17. 4%, compared to -58. 5% for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSGP returned +74. 0% versus ADT's -27. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ADT or CSGP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CoStar Group, Inc.

(CSGP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus ADT Inc. 's 0. 98β — meaning ADT is approximately 23% more volatile than CSGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 2% for ADT Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ADT or CSGP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CoStar Group, Inc.

(CSGP) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus 4. 7% for ADT Inc. (ADT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ADT Inc. grew EPS 28. 8% year-over-year, compared to -95. 1% for CoStar Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSGP leads at 14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ADT or CSGP?

ADT Inc.

(ADT) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 6% net margin versus 0. 2% for CoStar Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADT leads at 26. 0% versus -2. 2% for CSGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSGP leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ADT or CSGP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ADT Inc.

(ADT) trades at 7. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for CoStar Group, Inc. — 17. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSGP: 81. 7% to $61. 91.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ADT or CSGP?

In this comparison, ADT (3.

0% yield) pays a dividend. CSGP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ADT or CSGP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ADT Inc.

(ADT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 98), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADT: -27. 2%, CSGP: +74. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ADT and CSGP?

These companies operate in different sectors (ADT (Industrials) and CSGP (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ADT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ADT pays a dividend while CSGP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ADT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSGP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ADT and CSGP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ADT: 0.9% · CSGP: 22.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ADT: 10.4x · CSGP: 2052.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.