Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AFBI vs CZWI vs CHMG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
AFBI vs CZWI vs CHMG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $146M | $207M | $349M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $90M | $140M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $14M | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 61.3% | 54.7% | 64.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.8% | 7.0% | 14.2% |
| Forward P/E | 27.1x | 11.8x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $60M | $52M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $119M | $23M |
AFBI vs CZWI vs CHMG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affinity Bancshares… (AFBI) | 100 | 270.3 | +170.3% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 265.6 | +165.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AFBI vs CZWI vs CHMG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AFBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth -15.3%
- PEG 0.37 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 3.4% vs CZWI's 2.9%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
CHMG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 175.6% 10Y total return vs AFBI's 80.7%
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 11.8x)
- +52.6% vs AFBI's +23.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs CHMG's 0.55 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs CHMG's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.6% vs AFBI's +23.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs CHMG's 0.5% |
AFBI vs CZWI vs CHMG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AFBI vs CZWI vs CHMG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CHMG leads in 2 of 6 categories
AFBI leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CZWI and CHMG each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $140M annually — 2.7x AFBI's $52M. CZWI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHMG's 10.8%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $90M | $140M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $9M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $14M | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $11M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.3% | +54.7% | +64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +7.0% | +14.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +16.0% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +12.4% | +31.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.8% | +63.0% | +29.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CZWI and CHMG each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, CZWI trades at a 46% valuation discount to AFBI's 27.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AFBI offers better value at 0.37x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $146M | $207M | $349M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $165M | $140M | $331M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.13x | 14.70x | 23.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.79x | 10.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.37x | 2.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.37x | 15.69x | 14.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.92x | 2.29x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.11x | 1.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.92x | 19.90x | 7.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHMG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CZWI delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $6 for AFBI. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFBI's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs CHMG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.0% | +7.8% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +0.8% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +2.0% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +0.6% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 0.28x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | -$67M | -$18M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $119M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $60M | $52M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.49x | 0.16x | 0.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHMG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AFBI five years ago would be worth $18,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,900 for CZWI. Over the past 12 months, CHMG leads with a +52.6% total return vs AFBI's +23.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs CHMG's 24.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +24.3% | +33.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +52.1% | +52.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.2% | +153.7% | +93.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.2% | +69.0% | +86.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.7% | +149.0% | +175.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.8% | +36.4% | +24.6% |
Risk & Volatility
AFBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AFBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHMG's 0.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AFBI currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.50x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.53 | $22.62 | $73.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.20 | $12.83 | $43.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +94.9% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 51.2 | 68.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 41K | 32K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CZWI and CHMG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", CHMG as "Hold". For income investors, CHMG offers the higher dividend yield at 1.81% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $50.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.37 | $1.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | +0.1% |
CHMG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AFBI leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
AFBI vs CZWI vs CHMG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AFBI or CZWI or CHMG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
(AFBI) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AFBI or CZWI or CHMG?
On trailing P/E, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Affinity Bancshares, Inc. at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, Chemung Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AFBI or CZWI or CHMG?
Over the past 5 years, Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
(AFBI) delivered a total return of +88. 2%, compared to +69. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHMG returned +175. 6% versus AFBI's +80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AFBI or CZWI or CHMG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
(AFBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Chemung Financial Corporation's 0. 55β — meaning CHMG is approximately 152% more volatile than AFBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 47% for Affinity Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AFBI or CZWI or CHMG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
(AFBI) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 9. 0% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AFBI or CZWI or CHMG?
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHMG leads at 14. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHMG leads at 64. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AFBI or CZWI or CHMG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) trades at 10.
1x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — AFBI or CZWI or CHMG?
In this comparison, CHMG (1.
8% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. AFBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AFBI or CZWI or CHMG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, AFBI: +80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AFBI and CZWI and CHMG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AFBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CZWI, CHMG pay a dividend while AFBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.