Compare Stocks

3 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AFJK vs CANG vs BTBT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AFJK
Aimei Health Technology Co., Ltd

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$261M
5Y Perf.+319.2%
CANG
Cango Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.-9.8%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-30.7%

AFJK vs CANG vs BTBT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AFJK logoAFJK
CANG logoCANG
BTBT logoBTBT
IndustryShell CompaniesAuto - DealershipsFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$261M$250M$589M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$3.46B$164M
Net Income (TTM)$1M$-178M$137M
Gross Margin13.6%61.9%
Operating Margin7.3%16.8%
Forward P/E251.0x5.7x9.2x
Total Debt$2M$170M$14M
Cash & Equiv.$3K$1.29B$95M

AFJK vs CANG vs BTBTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AFJK
CANG
BTBT
StockJan 24May 26Return
Aimei Health Techno… (AFJK)100419.2+319.2%
Cango Inc. (CANG)10090.2-9.8%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10069.3-30.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AFJK vs CANG vs BTBT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Aimei Health Technology Co., Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AFJK
Aimei Health Technology Co., Ltd
The Banking Pick

AFJK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 320.4% 10Y total return vs CANG's -44.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 25.2%, current ratio 0.00x
  • Beta 0.23, current ratio 0.00x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
CANG
Cango Inc.
The Income Pick

CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 2.25
  • Lower P/E (5.7x vs 251.0x)
Best for: income & stability
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs AFJK's -57.2%
  • 17.3% margin vs CANG's -5.2%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs AFJK's -57.2%
ValueCANG logoCANGLower P/E (5.7x vs 251.0x)
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs CANG's -5.2%
Stability / SafetyAFJK logoAFJKBeta 0.23 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AFJK logoAFJK+288.0% vs CANG's -73.7%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC 6.5% vs 4.6%

AFJK vs CANG vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AFJKAimei Health Technology Co., Ltd

Segment breakdown not available.

CANGCango Inc.
FY 2024
After-market Service Facilitation Service Income
62.9%$41M
Loan Facilitation Income And Other Related Income
24.1%$16M
Automobile trading income
9.6%$6M
Service, Other
3.4%$2M
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260

AFJK vs CANG vs BTBT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCANGLAGGINGAFJK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

CANG and AFJK operate at a comparable scale, with $3.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CANG's -5.2%.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$3.5B$164M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$835,759$333M$166M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1M-$178M$137M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$565,100$0-$448M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+13.6%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.3%+16.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.2%+17.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-154.0%-65.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+58.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-59.1%+3.6%+2.8%
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CANG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 98% valuation discount to AFJK's 251.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTBT's 8.5x.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$261M$250M$589M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$263M$85M$508M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS251.03x5.66x9.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.13x8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.12x3.60x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share21.48x0.42x0.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
CANG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CANG. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFJK's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs AFJK's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.2%-4.1%+21.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.9%-2.3%+19.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.5%+4.6%+6.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.0%+4.5%+8.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9246
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.25x0.04x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2M-$1.1B-$81M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2,929$1.3B$95M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$170M$14M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.87x
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AFJK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AFJK five years ago would be worth $42,044 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,543 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, AFJK leads with a +288.0% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AFJK at 61.4% vs BTBT's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-43.7%-62.0%-10.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+288.0%-73.7%-9.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+320.4%+1.2%-19.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+320.4%-14.2%-84.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+320.4%-44.9%-60.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+61.4%+0.4%-7.1%
AFJK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AFJK and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AFJK is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTBT currently trades 40.2% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.23x2.25x3.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$130.37$2.88$4.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.75$0.33$1.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+32.7%+18.6%+40.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.258.669.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded21K1.3M18.5M
Evenly matched — AFJK and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CANG as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 173.2% for BTBT (target: $5). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.00$5.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts22
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises50
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.3%0.0%
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CANG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallCango Inc. (CANG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AFJK vs CANG vs BTBT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AFJK or CANG or BTBT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AFJK or CANG or BTBT?

On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus Aimei Health Technology Co. , Ltd at 251. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AFJK or CANG or BTBT?

Over the past 5 years, Aimei Health Technology Co.

, Ltd (AFJK) delivered a total return of +320. 4%, compared to -84. 6% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AFJK returned +320. 4% versus BTBT's -60. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AFJK or CANG or BTBT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aimei Health Technology Co.

, Ltd (AFJK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 1343% more volatile than AFJK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 25% for Aimei Health Technology Co. , Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AFJK or CANG or BTBT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -39. 3% for Aimei Health Technology Co. , Ltd. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AFJK or CANG or BTBT?

Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Aimei Health Technology Co. , Ltd — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus 0. 0% for AFJK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — AFJK or CANG or BTBT?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. AFJK, CANG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is AFJK or CANG or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Aimei Health Technology Co.

, Ltd (AFJK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), +320. 4% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AFJK: +320. 4%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between AFJK and CANG and BTBT?

These companies operate in different sectors (AFJK (Financial Services) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AFJK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AFJK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CANG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 2916%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AFJK and CANG and BTBT on the metrics below

P/E Ratio<
x
(AFJK: 251.0x · CANG: 5.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.