ALL vs HIG

For growth investors, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

(HIG) is the stronger pick with 7. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for The Allstate Corporation (ALL). The Allstate Corporation (ALL) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Allstate Corporation (ALL) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Allstate Corporation (ALL) is the cheapest at 5.

7x versus The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. at 10. 0x. On forward P/E, The Allstate Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. wins at 0. 44x versus The Allstate Corporation's 0. 47x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

(HIG) delivered a total return of +113. 2%, compared to +78. 0% for The Allstate Corporation (ALL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALL returned +265. 6% versus HIG's +237. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Allstate Corporation (ALL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

12β versus The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 0. 29β — meaning HIG is approximately 153% more volatile than ALL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 24% for The Allstate Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

(HIG) is pulling ahead at 7. 1% versus 4. 6% for The Allstate Corporation (ALL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Allstate Corporation grew EPS 124. 8% year-over-year, compared to 28. 7% for The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALL leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Allstate Corporation (ALL) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

5% net margin versus 13. 6% for The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALL leads at 19. 8% versus 16. 8% for HIG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIG leads at 46. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 44x versus The Allstate Corporation's 0. 47x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Allstate Corporation (ALL) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 10. 1x for The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HIG: 13. 9% to $152. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Allstate Corporation (ALL) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 1. 5% for The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Allstate Corporation (ALL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

12), 1. 8% yield, +265. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALL: +265. 6%, HIG: +237. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.