Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
ALLE vs ASGN vs MAS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Construction
ALLE vs ASGN vs MAS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Information Technology Services | Construction |
| Market Cap | $11.63B | $895M | $14.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.16B | $3.98B | $7.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $634M | $114M | $837M |
| Gross Margin | 45.0% | 28.4% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | 6.1% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 5.8x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.28B | $1.17B | $3.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $356M | $102M | $647M |
ALLE vs ASGN vs MAS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 135.7 | +35.7% |
| ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALLE vs ASGN vs MAS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALLE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 7.8%, EPS growth 9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, current ratio 1.84x
ASGN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 16.9x)
MAS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 152.3% 10Y total return vs ALLE's 125.6%
- 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ALLE's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +20.9% vs ASGN's -60.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.8% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 16.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.2% margin vs ASGN's 2.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs ASGN's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ALLE's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.9% vs ASGN's -60.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs ASGN's 3.1%, ROIC 35.4% vs 6.9% |
ALLE vs ASGN vs MAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALLE vs ASGN vs MAS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALLE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAS is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.7B annually — 1.9x ASGN's $4.0B. ALLE is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASGN's 2.9%. On growth, ALLE holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.2B | $4.0B | $7.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $959M | $360M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $634M | $114M | $837M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $704M | $288M | $943M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.0% | +28.4% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +6.1% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +2.9% | +10.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +7.2% | +12.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | -0.5% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.0% | -37.9% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ASGN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, ASGN trades at a 57% valuation discount to MAS's 18.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALLE offers better value at 1.07x vs MAS's 3.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.6B | $895M | $14.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.6B | $2.0B | $17.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.19x | 8.06x | 18.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.44x | 5.80x | 16.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.07x | — | 3.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.70x | 5.30x | 12.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.86x | 0.22x | 1.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.66x | 0.51x | 201.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.96x | 3.11x | 16.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $6 for ASGN. ASGN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.65x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALLE scores 6/9 vs ASGN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.1% | +6.3% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.3% | +3.1% | +15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.1% | +6.9% | +35.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.8% | +7.2% | +35.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.10x | 0.65x | 45.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.9B | $1.1B | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $356M | $102M | $647M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $1.2B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.61x | 1.96x | 12.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAS five years ago would be worth $11,754 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,009 for ASGN. Over the past 12 months, MAS leads with a +20.9% total return vs ASGN's -60.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAS at 11.9% vs ASGN's -31.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.6% | -55.1% | +12.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.8% | -60.2% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.2% | -68.2% | +40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | -79.9% | +17.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.6% | -41.2% | +152.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.5% | -31.7% | +11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALLE and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASGN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAS currently trades 90.9% from its 52-week high vs ASGN's 34.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 1.34x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $183.11 | $60.75 | $79.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $131.25 | $19.31 | $58.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.9% | +34.5% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.6 | 18.4 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 883K | 935K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
MAS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALLE as "Hold", ASGN as "Hold", MAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.4% upside for ASGN (target: $38) vs 14.5% for MAS (target: $82). For income investors, MAS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.73% vs ALLE's 1.50%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $172.50 | $37.60 | $82.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 13 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.03 | — | $1.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +19.0% | +3.9% |
MAS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ALLE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ALLE vs ASGN vs MAS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALLE or ASGN or MAS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger pick with 7.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Masco Corporation (MAS) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALLE or ASGN or MAS?
On trailing P/E, ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) is the cheapest at 8.
1x versus Masco Corporation at 18. 6x. On forward P/E, ASGN Incorporated is actually cheaper at 5. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allegion plc wins at 0. 91x versus Masco Corporation's 3. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALLE or ASGN or MAS?
Over the past 5 years, Masco Corporation (MAS) delivered a total return of +17.
5%, compared to -79. 9% for ASGN Incorporated (ASGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAS returned +152. 3% versus ASGN's -41. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALLE or ASGN or MAS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allegion plc (ALLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus ASGN Incorporated's 1. 34β — meaning ASGN is approximately 101% more volatile than ALLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 65% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALLE or ASGN or MAS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allegion plc (ALLE) is pulling ahead at 7.
8% versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Allegion plc grew EPS 9. 1% year-over-year, compared to -32. 1% for ASGN Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALLE leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALLE or ASGN or MAS?
Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus 2. 9% for ASGN Incorporated — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALLE leads at 21. 1% versus 6. 5% for ASGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLE leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALLE or ASGN or MAS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus Masco Corporation's 3. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for Masco Corporation — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASGN: 79. 4% to $37. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALLE or ASGN or MAS?
In this comparison, MAS (1.
7% yield), ALLE (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. ASGN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALLE or ASGN or MAS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 1. 5% yield, +125. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALLE: +125. 6%, ASGN: -41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALLE and ASGN and MAS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALLE (Industrials) and ASGN (Technology) and MAS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALLE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ASGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ALLE, MAS pay a dividend while ASGN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.