Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ALT vs NRXP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ALT vs NRXP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $337M | $85M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41K | $242K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-88M | $-38M |
| Gross Margin | -364.5% | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | -2304.6% | -63.0% |
| Total Debt | $34M | $631K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $8M |
ALT vs NRXP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) | 100 | 32.8 | -67.2% |
| NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP) | 100 | 2.8 | -97.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALT vs NRXP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.54
- 12.1% 10Y total return vs NRXP's -96.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.54, Low D/E 15.2%, current ratio 18.55x
NRXP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 43.9%
- -157.3% margin vs ALT's -2.1K%
- +55.3% vs ALT's -43.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 105.0% revenue growth vs NRXP's 101.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -157.3% margin vs ALT's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.54 vs NRXP's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.3% vs ALT's -43.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -41.7% ROA vs NRXP's -489.9% |
ALT vs NRXP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALT vs NRXP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRXP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRXP is the larger business by revenue, generating $242,000 annually — 5.9x ALT's $41,000. NRXP is the more profitable business, keeping -157.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALT's -2148.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41,000 | $242,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$94M | -$31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$88M | -$38M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$68M | -$12M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -364.5% | +59.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2304.6% | -63.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2148.6% | -157.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1654.7% | -49.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | -80.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ALT and NRXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $337M | $85M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $328M | $78M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.04x | -2.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8221.55x | 69.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NRXP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRXP scores 5/9 vs ALT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -49.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.7% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -46.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.0% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34M | $631,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -54.74x | -24.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALT five years ago would be worth $2,291 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $92 for NRXP. Over the past 12 months, NRXP leads with a +55.3% total return vs ALT's -43.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALT at -14.8% vs NRXP's -21.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.4% | +16.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.3% | +55.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.2% | -50.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.1% | -99.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1213.1% | -96.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.8% | -21.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALT and NRXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALT is the less volatile stock with a 1.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRXP's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NRXP currently trades 79.7% from its 52-week high vs ALT's 39.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 1.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.73 | $3.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.56 | $1.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.3% | +79.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 64.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 913K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.25 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
NRXP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ALT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ALT vs NRXP: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALT or NRXP a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Altimmune, Inc.
(ALT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ALT or NRXP?
Over the past 5 years, Altimmune, Inc.
(ALT) delivered a total return of -77. 1%, compared to -99. 1% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALT returned +1213% versus NRXP's -96. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ALT or NRXP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Altimmune, Inc.
(ALT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 54β versus NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning NRXP is approximately 24% more volatile than ALT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ALT or NRXP?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 43. 9% year-over-year, compared to 25. 4% for Altimmune, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ALT or NRXP?
NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(NRXP) is the more profitable company, earning -23. 4% net margin versus -2148. 6% for Altimmune, Inc. — meaning it keeps -23. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NRXP leads at -1324. 4% versus -2304. 6% for ALT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NRXP leads at 59. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ALT or NRXP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ALT or NRXP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Altimmune, Inc.
(ALT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1213% 10Y return). NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALT: +1213%, NRXP: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ALT and NRXP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NRXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.