Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMPH vs PCRX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMPH
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.06B
5Y Perf.+28.2%
PCRX
Pacira BioSciences, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$932M
5Y Perf.-46.1%

AMPH vs PCRX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMPH logoAMPH
PCRX logoPCRX
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Market Cap$1.06B$932M
Revenue (TTM)$720M$735M
Net Income (TTM)$98M$9M
Gross Margin49.5%60.2%
Operating Margin19.5%3.4%
Forward P/E7.4x8.6x
Total Debt$656M$454M
Cash & Equiv.$170M$159M

AMPH vs PCRXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMPH
PCRX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Amphastar Pharmaceu… (AMPH)100128.2+28.2%
Pacira BioSciences,… (PCRX)10053.9-46.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMPH vs PCRX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMPH leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Pacira BioSciences, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AMPH
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AMPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 103.9% 10Y total return vs PCRX's -50.0%
  • Lower P/E (7.4x vs 8.6x)
  • 13.6% margin vs PCRX's 1.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
PCRX
Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
The Income Pick

PCRX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.47
  • Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 107.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 65.6%, current ratio 4.54x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPCRX logoPCRX3.6% revenue growth vs AMPH's -1.7%
ValueAMPH logoAMPHLower P/E (7.4x vs 8.6x)
Quality / MarginsAMPH logoAMPH13.6% margin vs PCRX's 1.3%
Stability / SafetyPCRX logoPCRXBeta 0.47 vs AMPH's 1.40, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMPH logoAMPH+0.1% vs PCRX's -5.8%
Efficiency (ROA)AMPH logoAMPH6.0% ROA vs PCRX's 0.7%, ROIC 8.4% vs 2.3%

AMPH vs PCRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMPHAmphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Epinephrine
100.0%$71M
PCRXPacira BioSciences, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
50.9%$723M
EXPAREL
40.5%$575M
ZILRETTA
8.2%$117M
Bupivacaine Liposome Injectable Suspension
0.5%$7M

AMPH vs PCRX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMPHLAGGINGPCRX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PCRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

PCRX and AMPH operate at a comparable scale, with $735M and $720M in trailing revenue. AMPH is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PCRX's 1.3%. On growth, PCRX holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMPH logoAMPHAmphastar Pharmac…PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$720M$735M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$189M$95M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$98M$9M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$121M$133M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.5%+60.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.5%+3.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.6%+1.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.8%+18.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-1.8%+5.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-31.1%-30.0%
PCRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — AMPH and PCRX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 11.8x trailing earnings, AMPH trades at a 92% valuation discount to PCRX's 148.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PCRX's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMPH's 10.4x.

MetricAMPH logoAMPHAmphastar Pharmac…PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$932M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.6B$1.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS11.77x148.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.36x8.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.09x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.40x9.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.48x1.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.46x1.54x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.78x6.82x
Evenly matched — AMPH and PCRX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMPH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AMPH delivers a 12.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $1 for PCRX. PCRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMPH's 0.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCRX scores 9/9 vs AMPH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMPH logoAMPHAmphastar Pharmac…PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.8%+1.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.0%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.4%+2.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.8%+2.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–969
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.83x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$486M$296M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$170M$159M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$656M$454M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.85x2.37x
AMPH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMPH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMPH five years ago would be worth $13,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,748 for PCRX. Over the past 12 months, AMPH leads with a +0.1% total return vs PCRX's -5.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMPH at -13.1% vs PCRX's -17.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMPH logoAMPHAmphastar Pharmac…PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.7%-3.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+0.1%-5.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-34.4%-43.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+32.4%-62.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.9%-50.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-13.1%-17.5%
AMPH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PCRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMPH's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCRX currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs AMPH's 76.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMPH logoAMPHAmphastar Pharmac…PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.40x0.47x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$31.26$27.64
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.04$18.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.5%+85.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.354.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded524K694K
PCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates AMPH as "Hold" and PCRX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.5% upside for PCRX (target: $30) vs 8.8% for AMPH (target: $26).

MetricAMPH logoAMPHAmphastar Pharmac…PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$26.00$29.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1236
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+7.1%+15.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

PCRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). AMPH leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallAmphastar Pharmaceuticals, … (AMPH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMPH vs PCRX: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMPH or PCRX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Pacira BioSciences, Inc.

(PCRX) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH). Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMPH or PCRX?

On trailing P/E, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(AMPH) is the cheapest at 11. 8x versus Pacira BioSciences, Inc. at 148. 1x. On forward P/E, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMPH or PCRX?

Over the past 5 years, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(AMPH) delivered a total return of +32. 4%, compared to -62. 5% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMPH returned +103. 9% versus PCRX's -50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMPH or PCRX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pacira BioSciences, Inc.

(PCRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning AMPH is approximately 198% more volatile than PCRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 83% for Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMPH or PCRX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pacira BioSciences, Inc.

(PCRX) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -1. 7% for Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pacira BioSciences, Inc. grew EPS 107. 4% year-over-year, compared to -33. 7% for Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMPH leads at 13. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMPH or PCRX?

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(AMPH) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus 1. 0% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMPH leads at 19. 5% versus 4. 6% for PCRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PCRX leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMPH or PCRX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(AMPH) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCRX: 24. 5% to $29. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMPH or PCRX?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AMPH or PCRX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pacira BioSciences, Inc.

(PCRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCRX: -50. 0%, AMPH: +103. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMPH and PCRX?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMPH is a small-cap deep-value stock; PCRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

AMPH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PCRX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMPH and PCRX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMPH: -1.8% · PCRX: 5.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(AMPH: 11.8x · PCRX: 148.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.