Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Software - Application
AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Asset Management | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.67B | $226M | $95M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.98B | $97M | $40M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $31M | $46M | $-3M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 83.5% | 78.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 77.9% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 26.6x | 6.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.95B | $469M | $721K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $20M | $5M |
AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) | 100 | 147.0 | +47.0% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 55.6 | -44.4% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 90.4 | -9.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMRC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 87.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.03, current ratio 1.51x
- Beta 2.03, current ratio 1.51x
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 18.4%
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs AMRC's 9.2%
AEYE plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs AMRC's 9.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs AEYE's -7.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs AEYE's 2.29 | |
| Dividends | 18.4% yield; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +142.7% vs AEYE's -35.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs AEYE's -9.5%, ROIC 7.2% vs -42.4% |
AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 49.1x AEYE's $40M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AEYE's -7.6%. On growth, AMRC holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $97M | $40M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $204M | $63M | -$504,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $31M | $46M | -$3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$251M | $35M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +83.5% | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +77.9% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +50.6% | -7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.7% | -58.7% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.8% | — | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -100.0% | +29.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.6x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 88% valuation discount to AMRC's 38.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TPVG's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMRC's 15.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $226M | $95M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $674M | $91M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.01x | 4.57x | -30.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.61x | 6.04x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.50x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.43x | 8.90x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.86x | 2.32x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 0.63x | 19.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-48 for AEYE. AEYE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMRC's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPVG scores 5/9 vs AEYE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | +13.1% | -47.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +5.6% | -9.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +7.2% | -42.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +9.4% | -17.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.73x | 1.33x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.9B | $449M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $20M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $469M | $721,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.20x | 2.15x | -2.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TPVG five years ago would be worth $8,097 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,632 for AEYE. Over the past 12 months, AMRC leads with a +142.7% total return vs AEYE's -35.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEYE at 4.5% vs AMRC's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.9% | -12.7% | -23.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +142.7% | +8.6% | -35.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.5% | -7.5% | +14.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.2% | -19.0% | -63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +601.1% | +87.8% | +80.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.4% | -2.6% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
TPVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TPVG currently trades 74.0% from its 52-week high vs AEYE's 46.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 0.83x | 2.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.93 | $7.53 | $16.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.37 | $4.48 | $5.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.2% | +74.0% | +46.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.4 | 55.8 | 59.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 505K | 498K | 194K |
Analyst Outlook
AEYE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMRC as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.7% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 36.8% for AMRC (target: $43). TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 18.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.17 | $8.95 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 12 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +18.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AMRC leads in 1 (Total Returns).
AMRC vs TPVG vs AEYE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMRC or TPVG or AEYE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 2% for Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMRC or TPVG or AEYE?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus Ameresco, Inc. at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMRC or TPVG or AEYE?
Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) delivered a total return of -19. 0%, compared to -63. 7% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMRC returned +601. 1% versus AEYE's +80. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMRC or TPVG or AEYE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 175% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 173% for Ameresco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMRC or TPVG or AEYE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus 9. 2% for Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -22. 4% for Ameresco, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEYE leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMRC or TPVG or AEYE?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -7. 6% for AudioEye, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -7. 9% for AEYE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMRC or TPVG or AEYE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 26. 6x for Ameresco, Inc. — 20. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 60. 7% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMRC or TPVG or AEYE?
In this comparison, TPVG (18.
4% yield) pays a dividend. AMRC, AEYE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMRC or TPVG or AEYE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 18. 4% yield). AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +87. 8%, AEYE: +80. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMRC and TPVG and AEYE?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMRC (Industrials) and TPVG (Financial Services) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TPVG pays a dividend while AMRC, AEYE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.