Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMRX vs VTRS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
AMRX vs VTRS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $4.31B | $20.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.02B | $14.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $72M | $-296M |
| Gross Margin | 36.9% | 34.4% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | 1.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 7.1x |
| Total Debt | $124M | $14.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $282M | $1.35B |
AMRX vs VTRS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amneal Pharmaceutic… (AMRX) | 100 | 281.7 | +181.7% |
| Viatris Inc. (VTRS) | 100 | 101.9 | +1.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMRX vs VTRS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMRX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.17
- Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 157.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 2.17x
VTRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- -51.5% 10Y total return vs AMRX's -54.9%
- Beta 0.99, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.30x
- Lower P/E (7.1x vs 13.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.0% revenue growth vs VTRS's -3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.1x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs VTRS's -2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs AMRX's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +107.8% vs AMRX's +90.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs VTRS's -0.8%, ROIC -0.2% vs -6.6% |
AMRX vs VTRS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMRX vs VTRS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VTRS is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.6B annually — 4.8x AMRX's $3.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.4% (AMRX) to -2.0% (VTRS). On growth, AMRX holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $14.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $169M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $72M | -$296M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $150M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.9% | +34.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +1.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | -2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +11.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | +8.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +105.9% |
Valuation Metrics
VTRS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $20.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.2B | $33.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 62.36x | -5.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.81x | 7.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 248.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.43x | 1.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.62x | 1.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.98x | 10.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMRX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMRX delivers a 7.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-2 for VTRS. AMRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VTRS's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMRX scores 8/9 vs VTRS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.5% | -2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | -0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | -6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | -8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 1.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$158M | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $282M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $124M | $14.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.09x | -0.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AMRX and VTRS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMRX five years ago would be worth $26,385 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,034 for VTRS. Over the past 12 months, VTRS leads with a +107.8% total return vs AMRX's +90.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMRX at 89.4% vs VTRS's 24.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.4% | +40.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +90.0% | +107.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +579.2% | +91.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.8% | +40.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.9% | -51.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +89.4% | +24.2% |
Risk & Volatility
VTRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTRS is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMRX's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTRS currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs AMRX's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.20 | $17.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.02 | $8.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.3% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 75.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 10.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMRX as "Buy" and VTRS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.9% upside for AMRX (target: $17) vs -12.3% for VTRS (target: $15). VTRS is the only dividend payer here at 2.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $15.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.5% |
AMRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VTRS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
AMRX vs VTRS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMRX or VTRS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AMRX) is the stronger pick with 8. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 0% for Viatris Inc. (VTRS). Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMRX) offers the better valuation at 62. 4x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMRX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMRX or VTRS?
On forward P/E, Viatris Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMRX or VTRS?
Over the past 5 years, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AMRX) delivered a total return of +163. 8%, compared to +40. 3% for Viatris Inc. (VTRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VTRS returned -51. 5% versus AMRX's -54. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMRX or VTRS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Viatris Inc.
(VTRS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning AMRX is approximately 18% more volatile than VTRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 100% for Viatris Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMRX or VTRS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AMRX) is pulling ahead at 8. 0% versus -3. 0% for Viatris Inc. (VTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 157. 9% year-over-year, compared to -466. 0% for Viatris Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMRX leads at 10. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMRX or VTRS?
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AMRX) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 4% net margin versus -24. 6% for Viatris Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMRX leads at -0. 2% versus -18. 6% for VTRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMRX leads at 36. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMRX or VTRS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Viatris Inc.
(VTRS) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMRX: 23. 9% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMRX or VTRS?
In this comparison, VTRS (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. AMRX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMRX or VTRS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Viatris Inc.
(VTRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTRS: -51. 5%, AMRX: -54. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMRX and VTRS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
VTRS pays a dividend while AMRX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.