Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMSF vs KNTK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$556M
5Y Perf.-51.8%
KNTK
Kinetik Holdings Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.32B
5Y Perf.+598.8%

AMSF vs KNTK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMSF logoAMSF
KNTK logoKNTK
IndustryInsurance - SpecialtyOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$556M$3.32B
Revenue (TTM)$325M$1.76B
Net Income (TTM)$46M$252M
Gross Margin47.6%31.6%
Operating Margin17.8%9.3%
Forward P/E14.1x42.2x
Total Debt$491K$3.87B
Cash & Equiv.$62M$4M

AMSF vs KNTKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMSF
KNTK
StockMay 20May 26Return
AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF)10048.2-51.8%
Kinetik Holdings In… (KNTK)100698.8+598.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMSF vs KNTK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KNTK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. AMERISAFE, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

AMSF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 33.4% 10Y total return vs KNTK's -33.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.32x
  • Lower P/E (14.1x vs 42.2x)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
KNTK
Kinetik Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick

KNTK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 16.5%
  • Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
  • Beta 0.60, yield 16.5%, current ratio 0.69x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKNTK logoKNTK19.0% revenue growth vs AMSF's 2.6%
ValueAMSF logoAMSFLower P/E (14.1x vs 42.2x)
Quality / MarginsKNTK logoKNTK14.3% margin vs AMSF's 14.3%
Stability / SafetyAMSF logoAMSFBeta 0.23 vs KNTK's 0.60, lower leverage
DividendsKNTK logoKNTK16.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AMSF's 8.6%
Momentum (1Y)KNTK logoKNTK+26.9% vs AMSF's -31.7%
Efficiency (ROA)AMSF logoAMSF5.6% ROA vs KNTK's 3.5%, ROIC 21.9% vs 1.9%

AMSF vs KNTK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KNTKKinetik Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Natural Gas, NGLs and Condensate Sales
74.1%$1.3B
Gathering and Processing Services
25.2%$445M
Product and Service, Other
0.7%$12M

AMSF vs KNTK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKNTKLAGGINGAMSF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KNTK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

KNTK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 5.4x AMSF's $325M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.3% (KNTK) to 14.3% (AMSF).

MetricAMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.KNTK logoKNTKKinetik Holdings …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$325M$1.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$58M$548M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$46M$252M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$8M$351M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.6%+31.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+17.8%+9.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.3%+14.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.5%+19.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.3%+11.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.5%
KNTK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMSF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.0x trailing earnings, AMSF trades at a 35% valuation discount to KNTK's 18.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMSF's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KNTK's 13.1x.

MetricAMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.KNTK logoKNTKKinetik Holdings …
Market CapShares × price$556M$3.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$495M$7.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS11.98x18.33x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.09x42.23x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.30x13.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.75x1.88x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.25x1.03x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF62.35x44.56x
AMSF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMSF leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

AMSF delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $9 for KNTK. AMSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KNTK's 1.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSF scores 7/9 vs KNTK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.KNTK logoKNTKKinetik Holdings …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.7%+9.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.6%+3.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+21.9%+1.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+16.8%+2.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x1.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$61M$3.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$62M$4M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$491,000$3.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.51x
AMSF leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KNTK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KNTK five years ago would be worth $19,841 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,946 for AMSF. Over the past 12 months, KNTK leads with a +26.9% total return vs AMSF's -31.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KNTK at 24.5% vs AMSF's -9.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.KNTK logoKNTKKinetik Holdings …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-20.1%+36.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-31.7%+26.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-26.1%+93.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-20.5%+98.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+33.4%-33.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-9.6%+24.5%
KNTK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AMSF and KNTK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AMSF is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNTK's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KNTK currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs AMSF's 61.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.KNTK logoKNTKKinetik Holdings …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.23x0.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$48.54$51.11
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$29.42$31.33
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.0%+94.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10034.864.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded211K1.2M
Evenly matched — AMSF and KNTK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KNTK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates AMSF as "Buy" and KNTK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.3% upside for AMSF (target: $45) vs -1.3% for KNTK (target: $48). For income investors, KNTK offers the higher dividend yield at 16.55% vs AMSF's 8.61%.

MetricAMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.KNTK logoKNTKKinetik Holdings …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$44.50$47.57
# AnalystsCovering analysts615
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+8.6%+16.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.55$7.98
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.2%+5.3%
KNTK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KNTK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). AMSF leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallKinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMSF vs KNTK: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMSF or KNTK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Kinetik Holdings Inc.

(KNTK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMSF or KNTK?

On trailing P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus Kinetik Holdings Inc. at 18. 3x. On forward P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMSF or KNTK?

Over the past 5 years, Kinetik Holdings Inc.

(KNTK) delivered a total return of +98. 4%, compared to -20. 5% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMSF returned +33. 4% versus KNTK's -33. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMSF or KNTK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Kinetik Holdings Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning KNTK is approximately 158% more volatile than AMSF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 132% for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMSF or KNTK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kinetik Holdings Inc.

(KNTK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kinetik Holdings Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for AMERISAFE, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KNTK leads at 13. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMSF or KNTK?

AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 9% net margin versus 10. 1% for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMSF leads at 18. 6% versus 9. 3% for KNTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMSF leads at 46. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMSF or KNTK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 42. 2x for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — 28. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMSF: 50. 3% to $44. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMSF or KNTK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) offers the highest yield at 16. 5%, versus 8. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF).

09

Is AMSF or KNTK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 8. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSF: +33. 4%, KNTK: -33. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMSF and KNTK?

These companies operate in different sectors (AMSF (Financial Services) and KNTK (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AMSF is a small-cap deep-value stock; KNTK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

AMSF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KNTK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMSF and KNTK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMSF: 10.3% · KNTK: 11.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(AMSF: 14.3% · KNTK: 14.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(AMSF: 12.0x · KNTK: 18.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.