AMTM vs BAH

For growth investors, Amentum Holdings, Inc.

(AMTM) is the stronger pick with 71. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amentum Holdings, Inc. (AMTM) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the cheapest at 10.

5x versus Amentum Holdings, Inc. at 92. 2x. On forward P/E, Amentum Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) delivered a total return of +2.

1%, compared to -15. 7% for Amentum Holdings, Inc. (AMTM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BAH returned +227. 5% versus AMTM's -15. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

35β versus Amentum Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning AMTM is approximately 237% more volatile than BAH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amentum Holdings, Inc. (AMTM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 94% versus 4% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amentum Holdings, Inc.

(AMTM) is pulling ahead at 71. 6% versus 12. 4% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amentum Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 179. 4% year-over-year, compared to 58. 0% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMTM leads at 23. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

8% net margin versus 0. 5% for Amentum Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BAH leads at 11. 4% versus 3. 5% for AMTM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BAH leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Amentum Holdings, Inc.

(AMTM) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMTM: 45. 8% to $36. 29.

In this comparison, BAH (2.

7% yield) pays a dividend. AMTM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

35), 2. 7% yield, +227. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAH: +227. 5%, AMTM: -15. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; BAH is a mid-cap deep-value stock. BAH pays a dividend while AMTM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.