Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
AOSL vs DIOD vs POWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
AOSL vs DIOD vs POWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $1.47B | $5.34B | $4.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $685M | $1.48B | $444M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-77M | $66M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | 31.2% | 54.5% |
| Operating Margin | -6.4% | 2.4% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 50.0x | 60.5x |
| Total Debt | $51M | $96M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $153M | $367M | $59M |
AOSL vs DIOD vs POWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha and Omega Sem… (AOSL) | 100 | 468.9 | +368.9% |
| Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) | 100 | 238.6 | +138.6% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 144.4 | +44.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AOSL vs DIOD vs POWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AOSL plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
DIOD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 50.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.5%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs AOSL's 255.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.11, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 3.32x
POWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 1.1%
- Beta 2.08, yield 1.1%, current ratio 6.51x
- 5.0% margin vs AOSL's -11.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (50.0x vs 60.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.0% margin vs AOSL's -11.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.08 vs AOSL's 2.81 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +199.8% vs POWI's +57.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs AOSL's -7.6%, ROIC 2.4% vs -2.8% |
AOSL vs DIOD vs POWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AOSL vs DIOD vs POWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
POWI leads in 2 of 6 categories
AOSL leads 1 • DIOD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIOD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 3.3x POWI's $444M. POWI is the more profitable business, keeping 5.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AOSL's -11.2%. On growth, DIOD holds the edge at +15.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $685M | $1.5B | $444M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | $179M | $54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$77M | $66M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | $137M | $87M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | +31.2% | +54.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +2.4% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.2% | +4.5% | +5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +9.3% | +19.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +15.4% | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.3% | +22.2% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AOSL and DIOD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 81.2x trailing earnings, DIOD trades at a 60% valuation discount to POWI's 200.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIOD's 28.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than POWI's 86.9x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $5.3B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $5.1B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.95x | 81.15x | 200.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 49.97x | 60.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.22x | 28.28x | 86.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.11x | 3.60x | 9.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.76x | 2.78x | 6.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 38.93x | 50.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DIOD and POWI each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DIOD delivers a 3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-9 for AOSL. DIOD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AOSL's 0.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIOD scores 6/9 vs AOSL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.4% | +3.4% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.6% | +2.7% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | +1.6% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.0% | +1.7% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.05x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | -$272M | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $153M | $367M | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $51M | $96M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -202.36x | 31.24x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AOSL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AOSL five years ago would be worth $16,888 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,143 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, DIOD leads with a +199.8% total return vs POWI's +57.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AOSL at 27.1% vs POWI's 0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +138.8% | +125.6% | +110.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +149.8% | +199.8% | +57.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.5% | +37.7% | +1.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.9% | +60.4% | +1.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +255.1% | +505.7% | +264.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.1% | +11.2% | +0.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DIOD and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
POWI is the less volatile stock with a 2.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AOSL's 2.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.81x | 2.11x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.97 | $116.49 | $78.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.01 | $37.97 | $30.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +99.6% | +99.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.1 | 78.4 | 75.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 637K | 520K | 948K |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AOSL as "Buy", DIOD as "Buy", POWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1.0% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -36.2% for DIOD (target: $74). POWI is the only dividend payer here at 1.07% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.00 | $74.00 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 13 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +2.3% |
POWI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). AOSL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
AOSL vs DIOD vs POWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AOSL or DIOD or POWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is the stronger pick with 13.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) offers the better valuation at 81. 2x trailing P/E (50. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AOSL or DIOD or POWI?
On trailing P/E, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is the cheapest at 81.
2x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 200. 6x. On forward P/E, Diodes Incorporated is actually cheaper at 50. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AOSL or DIOD or POWI?
Over the past 5 years, Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) delivered a total return of +68.
9%, compared to +1. 4% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DIOD returned +505. 7% versus AOSL's +255. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AOSL or DIOD or POWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 08β versus Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited's 2. 81β — meaning AOSL is approximately 35% more volatile than POWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 6% for Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AOSL or DIOD or POWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is pulling ahead at 13.
0% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Diodes Incorporated grew EPS 50. 5% year-over-year, compared to -746. 2% for Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, AOSL leads at -3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AOSL or DIOD or POWI?
Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -13. 9% for Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: POWI leads at 4. 8% versus -4. 1% for AOSL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POWI leads at 54. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AOSL or DIOD or POWI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) trades at 50.
0x forward P/E versus 60. 5x for Power Integrations, Inc. — 10. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 1. 0% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AOSL or DIOD or POWI?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. AOSL, DIOD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AOSL or DIOD or POWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield, +264. 8% 10Y return). Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) carries a higher beta of 2. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (POWI: +264. 8%, AOSL: +255. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AOSL and DIOD and POWI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
POWI pays a dividend while AOSL, DIOD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.