Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
APLD vs CIFR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
APLD vs CIFR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $12.65B | $8.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $282M | $224M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-123M | $-898M |
| Gross Margin | 16.4% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | -31.5% | -150.7% |
| Total Debt | $703M | $2.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $114M | $628M |
APLD vs CIFR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applied Digital Cor… (APLD) | 100 | 1315.5 | +1215.5% |
| Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) | 100 | 723.1 | +623.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APLD vs CIFR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 3.23, yield 0.0%
- Rev growth 57.7%, EPS growth 11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 193.2%
- 8.1% 10Y total return vs CIFR's 121.3%
In this particular matchup, CIFR is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 57.7% revenue growth vs CIFR's 48.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -43.5% margin vs CIFR's -367.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 3.23 vs CIFR's 3.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.5% vs CIFR's +6.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.3% ROA vs CIFR's -24.7%, ROIC -7.3% vs -11.7% |
APLD vs CIFR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
APLD vs CIFR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APLD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APLD and CIFR operate at a comparable scale, with $282M and $224M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -43.5% (APLD) to -3.7% (CIFR).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $282M | $224M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$53M | -$203M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$123M | -$898M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.3B | -$930M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.5% | -150.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -43.5% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | -3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.4% | -154.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CIFR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.7B | $8.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.2B | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -38.10x | -10.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1167.03x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 58.71x | 39.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.03x | 10.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
APLD leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APLD delivers a -6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-116 for CIFR. APLD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIFR's 3.31x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.2% | -115.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -24.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.3% | -11.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.5% | -15.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 3.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $589M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $114M | $628M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $703M | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.01x | -32.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APLD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APLD five years ago would be worth $91,134 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,020 for CIFR. Over the past 12 months, APLD leads with a +748.4% total return vs CIFR's +620.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APLD at 135.4% vs CIFR's 124.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +57.2% | +35.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +748.4% | +620.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1203.8% | +1023.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +811.3% | +120.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +811.3% | +121.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +135.4% | +124.0% |
Risk & Volatility
APLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
APLD is the less volatile stock with a 3.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIFR's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APLD currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs CIFR's 85.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.23x | 3.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.22 | $25.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.99 | $2.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +85.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.2 | 68.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20.2M | 25.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates APLD as "Buy" and CIFR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for APLD (target: $61) vs 27.2% for CIFR (target: $28).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.00 | $27.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +1.0% |
APLD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CIFR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
APLD vs CIFR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APLD or CIFR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) is the stronger pick with 57.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 48. 0% for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Analysts rate Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — APLD or CIFR?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) delivered a total return of +811.
3%, compared to +120. 2% for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APLD returned +811. 3% versus CIFR's +121. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — APLD or CIFR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) is the lower-risk stock at 3.
23β versus Cipher Mining Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning CIFR is approximately 20% more volatile than APLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 111% versus 3% for Cipher Mining Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — APLD or CIFR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) is pulling ahead at 57.
7% versus 48. 0% for Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Applied Digital Corporation grew EPS 11. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1435. 7% for Cipher Mining Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — APLD or CIFR?
Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) is the more profitable company, earning -107.
2% net margin versus -367. 2% for Cipher Mining Inc. — meaning it keeps -107. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APLD leads at -33. 5% versus -150. 7% for CIFR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIFR leads at 28. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — APLD or CIFR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is APLD or CIFR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+811.
3% 10Y return). Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) carries a higher beta of 3. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APLD: +811. 3%, CIFR: +121. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between APLD and CIFR?
These companies operate in different sectors (APLD (Technology) and CIFR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.