ARKR vs TXRH

For growth investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) offers the better valuation at 25. 9x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) a "Hold" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) delivered a total return of +61. 6%, compared to -55. 9% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus ARKR's -36. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ark Restaurants Corp.

(ARKR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 42β versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 0. 70β — meaning TXRH is approximately -266% more volatile than ARKR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 3% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Texas Roadhouse, Inc. grew EPS -5. 7% year-over-year, compared to -194. 4% for Ark Restaurants Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXRH leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -6. 9% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXRH leads at 8. 6% versus -2. 5% for ARKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARKR leads at 35. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, TXRH (1.

7% yield) pays a dividend. ARKR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ark Restaurants Corp.

(ARKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 42)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARKR: -36. 1%, TXRH: +288. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

TXRH pays a dividend while ARKR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.