Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ATII vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
ATII vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $71M | $234M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $192K | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $20M |
ATII vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Archimedes Tech SPA… (ATII) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 95.1 | -4.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATII vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATII carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.05
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05
- Beta 0.05
TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 91.2% 10Y total return vs ATII's 8.3%
- 17.8% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +7.4% vs ATII's +7.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs TPVG's 0.77 | |
| Dividends | 17.8% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.4% vs ATII's +7.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5% |
ATII vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG and ATII operate at a comparable scale, with $97M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$693,975 | -$59M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ATII leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $71M | $234M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $71M | $683M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -540.00x | 4.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ATII leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPVG scores 4/9 vs ATII's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $192,033 | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $192,033 | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ATII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATII five years ago would be worth $10,833 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,479 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +7.4% total return vs ATII's +7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATII at 2.7% vs TPVG's -1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.3% | -9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.4% | +7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.3% | -5.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.3% | -15.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.3% | +91.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.7% | -1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ATII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATII is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATII currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs TPVG's 76.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.89 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.05 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +76.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.4 | 67.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 178K | 501K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 17.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +17.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ATII leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency.
ATII vs TPVG: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATII or TPVG a better buy right now?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATII or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, Archimedes Tech SPAC Partners II Co.
Ordinary Shares (ATII) delivered a total return of +8. 3%, compared to -15. 2% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +91. 2% versus ATII's +8. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATII or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Archimedes Tech SPAC Partners II Co.
Ordinary Shares (ATII) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 77β — meaning TPVG is approximately 1342% more volatile than ATII relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — ATII or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for Archimedes Tech SPAC Partners II Co. Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 0. 0% for ATII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — ATII or TPVG?
In this comparison, TPVG (17.
8% yield) pays a dividend. ATII does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is ATII or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Archimedes Tech SPAC Partners II Co.
Ordinary Shares (ATII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATII: +8. 3%, TPVG: +91. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between ATII and TPVG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. TPVG pays a dividend while ATII does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare TPVG vs HRZN
HRZN is one of the most direct listed alternatives to TPVG.
Compare ATII vs ACIC
ACIC overlaps with ATII in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With HRZN + HTGC
HRZN and HTGC are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.