Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
ATNI vs LUMN vs SHEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
ATNI vs LUMN vs SHEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $395M | $8.71B | $898M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $731M | $12.12B | $266M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-1.74B | $-36M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 35.2% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | -2.6% | -10.3% |
| Forward P/E | 41.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $694M | $17.71B | $642M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $1.00B | $27M |
ATNI vs LUMN vs SHEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATN International, … (ATNI) | 100 | 43.3 | -56.7% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 30.8 | -69.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATNI vs LUMN vs SHEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATNI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.47, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.26x
LUMN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.0% vs SHEN's +41.3%
SHEN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth -120.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
- 21.6% 10Y total return vs LUMN's -35.7%
- 9.1% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.1% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.3% margin vs LUMN's -14.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs LUMN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LUMN's 0.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.0% vs SHEN's +41.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs LUMN's -5.3%, ROIC 2.6% vs -0.8% |
ATNI vs LUMN vs SHEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ATNI vs LUMN vs SHEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ATNI leads in 4 of 6 categories
LUMN leads 0 • SHEN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATNI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LUMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 45.5x SHEN's $266M. ATNI is the more profitable business, keeping -1.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUMN's -14.3%. On growth, ATNI holds the edge at +1.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $731M | $12.1B | $266M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $139M | $2.4B | $104M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$1.7B | -$36M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $5.4B | -$276M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.9% | +35.2% | +37.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | -2.6% | -10.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | -14.3% | -13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +44.9% | -103.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | -8.9% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.0% | 0.0% | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ATNI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ATNI's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHEN's 13.8x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $395M | $8.7B | $898M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $972M | $25.4B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.23x | -4.83x | -22.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 41.47x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.35x | 9.91x | 13.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 0.70x | 2.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | — | 0.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.00x | 23.49x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ATNI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATNI delivers a -1.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN. SHEN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATNI's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATNI scores 5/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.5% | -79.4% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | -5.3% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | -0.8% | -1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | -0.6% | -1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.08x | — | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $577M | $16.7B | $614M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $1.0B | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $694M | $17.7B | $642M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.91x | -1.12x | -0.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LUMN and SHEN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHEN five years ago would be worth $7,209 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,348 for ATNI. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +100.0% total return vs SHEN's +41.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.4% vs ATNI's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.9% | +10.0% | +43.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.0% | +100.0% | +41.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.0% | +267.8% | -13.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.5% | -28.8% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | -35.7% | +21.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.6% | +54.4% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATNI and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATNI is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEN currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs LUMN's 70.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 2.74x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.45 | $11.95 | $17.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.76 | $3.37 | $9.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.4% | +70.8% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 73.4 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 80K | 12.5M | 300K |
Analyst Outlook
ATNI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATNI as "Buy", LUMN as "Hold", SHEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -16.3% for LUMN (target: $7). For income investors, ATNI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs SHEN's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.00 | $7.08 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 28 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +0.0% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.03 | $0.00 | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ATNI leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
ATNI vs LUMN vs SHEN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATNI or LUMN or SHEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger pick with 9.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Analysts rate ATN International, Inc. (ATNI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATNI or LUMN or SHEN?
Over the past 5 years, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) delivered a total return of -27.
9%, compared to -36. 5% for ATN International, Inc. (ATNI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHEN returned +21. 6% versus ATNI's -53. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATNI or LUMN or SHEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ATN International, Inc.
(ATNI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately 489% more volatile than ATNI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 108% for ATN International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ATNI or LUMN or SHEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is pulling ahead at 9.
1% versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ATN International, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHEN leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ATNI or LUMN or SHEN?
ATN International, Inc.
(ATNI) is the more profitable company, earning -2. 0% net margin versus -14. 0% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps -2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATNI leads at 6. 0% versus -6. 2% for SHEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LUMN leads at 46. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ATNI or LUMN or SHEN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78.
7% to $29. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ATNI or LUMN or SHEN?
In this comparison, ATNI (4.
0% yield), SHEN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. LUMN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ATNI or LUMN or SHEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ATN International, Inc.
(ATNI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47), 4. 0% yield). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATNI: -53. 5%, LUMN: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ATNI and LUMN and SHEN?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATNI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ATNI, SHEN pay a dividend while LUMN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 1.5%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.