ATRO vs CW

For growth investors, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the stronger pick with 12.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 4% for Astronics Corporation (ATRO). Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) offers the better valuation at 57. 7x trailing P/E (49. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astronics Corporation (ATRO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the cheapest at 57.

7x versus Astronics Corporation at 96. 5x. On forward P/E, Astronics Corporation is actually cheaper at 29. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) delivered a total return of +475.

4%, compared to +357. 0% for Astronics Corporation (ATRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CW returned +837. 8% versus ATRO's +193. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

23β versus Astronics Corporation's 1. 74β — meaning ATRO is approximately 41% more volatile than CW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 3% for Astronics Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is pulling ahead at 12.

1% versus 8. 4% for Astronics Corporation (ATRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astronics Corporation grew EPS 276. 1% year-over-year, compared to 22. 0% for Curtiss-Wright Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATRO leads at 17. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

8% net margin versus 3. 4% for Astronics Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CW leads at 18. 2% versus 8. 9% for ATRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CW leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Astronics Corporation (ATRO) trades at 29.

6x forward P/E versus 49. 3x for Curtiss-Wright Corporation — 19. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATRO: 36. 8% to $107. 00.

In this comparison, CW (0.

1% yield) pays a dividend. ATRO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

23), +837. 8% 10Y return). Astronics Corporation (ATRO) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CW: +837. 8%, ATRO: +193. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.