Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AUUD vs IHRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Broadcasting
AUUD vs IHRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Broadcasting |
| Market Cap | $515K | $911M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $3.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-473M |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -0.5% |
| Total Debt | $114K | $5.79B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $271K |
AUUD vs IHRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auddia Inc. (AUUD) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) | 100 | 41.7 | -58.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AUUD vs IHRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AUUD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 49.0%
- EPS growth 90.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 3.46x
IHRT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -67.4% 10Y total return vs AUUD's -100.0%
- +438.5% vs AUUD's -93.2%
- -12.0% ROA vs AUUD's -175.1%, ROIC -0.4% vs -303.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.3% revenue growth vs IHRT's 0.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs IHRT's -12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs IHRT's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 49.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IHRT's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +438.5% vs AUUD's -93.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -12.0% ROA vs AUUD's -175.1%, ROIC -0.4% vs -303.9% |
AUUD vs IHRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AUUD vs IHRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AUUD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IHRT and AUUD operate at a comparable scale, with $3.9B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $339M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$473M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +78.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -0.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.3% | -20.8% |
Valuation Metrics
IHRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $514,928 | $911M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$3M | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -1.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.08x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 83.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IHRT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IHRT scores 4/9 vs AUUD's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -175.1% | -12.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.0% | -0.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -145.5% | -0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $5.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $270,900 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $113,607 | $5.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1485.02x | -0.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IHRT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IHRT five years ago would be worth $2,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for AUUD. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +438.5% total return vs AUUD's -93.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IHRT at 24.4% vs AUUD's -88.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -76.5% | +41.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -93.2% | +438.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +92.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -70.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -67.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -88.8% | +24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AUUD and IHRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AUUD is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IHRT's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IHRT currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs AUUD's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.03 | $6.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.97 | $1.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.3% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.4 | 77.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 974K |
Analyst Outlook
AUUD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, AUUD offers the higher dividend yield at 49.05% vs IHRT's 0.18%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +49.0% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IHRT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AUUD leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
AUUD vs IHRT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AUUD or IHRT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate iHeartMedia, Inc.
(IHRT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AUUD or IHRT?
Over the past 5 years, iHeartMedia, Inc.
(IHRT) delivered a total return of -70. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for Auddia Inc. (AUUD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IHRT returned -67. 4% versus AUUD's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AUUD or IHRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Auddia Inc.
(AUUD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus iHeartMedia, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning IHRT is approximately 279% more volatile than AUUD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — AUUD or IHRT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Auddia Inc.
grew EPS 90. 3% year-over-year, compared to 54. 3% for iHeartMedia, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AUUD or IHRT?
Auddia Inc.
(AUUD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -12. 2% for iHeartMedia, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AUUD leads at 0. 0% versus -0. 5% for IHRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IHRT leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AUUD or IHRT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Auddia Inc. (AUUD) offers the highest yield at 49. 0%, versus 0. 2% for iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT).
07Is AUUD or IHRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Auddia Inc.
(AUUD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 49. 0% yield). iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AUUD: -100. 0%, IHRT: -67. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AUUD and IHRT?
These companies operate in different sectors (AUUD (Technology) and IHRT (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AUUD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AUUD pays a dividend while IHRT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare IHRT vs CMLS
CMLS is one of the most direct listed alternatives to IHRT.
Compare AUUD vs SPOT
SPOT overlaps with AUUD in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With SPOT + AMZN
SPOT and AMZN are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.