Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
BAYA vs ACHR vs GS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Financial - Capital Markets
BAYA vs ACHR vs GS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Aerospace & Defense | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $85M | $4.67B | $287.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $300K | $126.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $481K | $-618M | $16.67B |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -2431.0% | 14.5% |
| Forward P/E | 49.5x | — | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $500K | $42M | $616.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $94K | $1.02B | $182.09B |
BAYA vs ACHR vs GS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bayview Acquisition… (BAYA) | 100 | 118.8 | +18.8% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 102.3 | +2.3% |
| The Goldman Sachs G… (GS) | 100 | 240.0 | +140.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAYA vs ACHR vs GS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BAYA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.09
- EPS growth 20.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.09, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 0.10x
ACHR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
GS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs BAYA's 18.8%
- 17.0% NII/revenue growth vs BAYA's -48.0%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.0% NII/revenue growth vs BAYA's -48.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.3% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs ACHR's 2.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.6% vs ACHR's -26.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.4% ROA vs ACHR's -32.9%, ROIC -1.6% vs -89.6% |
BAYA vs ACHR vs GS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BAYA vs ACHR vs GS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS and BAYA operate at a comparable scale, with $126.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. GS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $300,000 | $126.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$709M | $23.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $481,015 | -$618M | $16.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$187,130 | -$512M | $15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2431.0% | +14.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2060.7% | +11.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -1705.7% | -12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.3% | +43.5% | +45.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ACHR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.8x trailing earnings, GS trades at a 54% valuation discount to BAYA's 49.5x P/E.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $4.7B | $287.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $86M | $3.7B | $722.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 49.54x | -6.34x | 22.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 15.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 34.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 9999.00x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.35x | 1.78x | 2.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BAYA and GS each lead in 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GS delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACHR. BAYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GS's 5.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACHR scores 5/9 vs GS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.7% | -37.8% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | -32.9% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.6% | -89.6% | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | -44.3% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.02x | 5.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $406,380 | -$979M | $434.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $93,620 | $1.0B | $182.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $500,000 | $42M | $616.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth $26,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,369 for ACHR. Over the past 12 months, GS leads with a +70.6% total return vs ACHR's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GS at 43.5% vs BAYA's 5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.2% | -22.8% | +1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.6% | -26.6% | +70.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | +193.5% | +195.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | -36.3% | +164.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | -37.0% | +534.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.9% | +43.2% | +43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BAYA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BAYA is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACHR's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAYA currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs ACHR's 43.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.09x | 2.96x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.24 | $14.62 | $984.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.81 | $4.80 | $547.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.1% | +43.0% | +94.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 61.5 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 27.6M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACHR as "Buy", GS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 96.3% upside for ACHR (target: $12) vs 7.6% for GS (target: $996). GS is the only dividend payer here at 1.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.33 | $995.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $13.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +27.9% | 0.0% | +3.5% |
GS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ACHR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BAYA vs ACHR vs GS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAYA or ACHR or GS a better buy right now?
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BAYA or ACHR or GS?
On trailing P/E, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the cheapest at 22. 8x versus Bayview Acquisition Corp Class A Ordinary Shares at 49. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BAYA or ACHR or GS?
Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) delivered a total return of +164. 4%, compared to -36. 3% for Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GS returned +534. 3% versus ACHR's -37. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BAYA or ACHR or GS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bayview Acquisition Corp Class A Ordinary Shares (BAYA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
09β versus Archer Aviation Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning ACHR is approximately 3370% more volatile than BAYA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bayview Acquisition Corp Class A Ordinary Shares (BAYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BAYA or ACHR or GS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bayview Acquisition Corp Class A Ordinary Shares grew EPS 20.
6% year-over-year, compared to 30. 3% for Archer Aviation Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BAYA or ACHR or GS?
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 3% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GS leads at 14. 5% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GS leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BAYA or ACHR or GS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACHR: 96.
3% to $12. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — BAYA or ACHR or GS?
In this comparison, GS (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. BAYA, ACHR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BAYA or ACHR or GS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bayview Acquisition Corp Class A Ordinary Shares (BAYA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
09)). Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAYA: +18. 8%, ACHR: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BAYA and ACHR and GS?
These companies operate in different sectors (BAYA (Financial Services) and ACHR (Industrials) and GS (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BAYA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GS is a large-cap high-growth stock. GS pays a dividend while BAYA, ACHR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.