Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BBBY vs TGT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Discount Stores
BBBY vs TGT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores |
| Market Cap | $383M | $59.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $106.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-61M | $4.04B |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 27.3% |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | 5.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.3x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $5.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $175M | $5.49B |
BBBY vs TGT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bed Bath & Beyond I… (BBBY) | 100 | 28.8 | -71.2% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 106.4 | +6.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BBBY vs TGT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BBBY is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 3.12, Low D/E 10.1%, current ratio 1.25x
TGT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 3.5%
- Rev growth -1.7%, EPS growth -8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.3%
- 108.0% 10Y total return vs BBBY's -48.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.7% revenue growth vs BBBY's -25.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs BBBY's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs BBBY's 3.12 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield; 22-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs BBBY's +41.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs BBBY's -15.3%, ROIC 16.7% vs -91.0% |
BBBY vs TGT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BBBY vs TGT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGT is the larger business by revenue, generating $106.2B annually — 100.2x BBBY's $1.1B. TGT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBBY's -5.8%. On growth, BBBY holds the edge at +6.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $106.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | $8.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$61M | $4.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$76M | $2.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +27.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +5.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | +2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +67.7% | +23.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BBBY leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $383M | $59.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $230M | $59.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.75x | 16.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 3.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT delivers a 26.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-32 for BBBY. BBBY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TGT's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TGT scores 6/9 vs BBBY's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.4% | +26.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.3% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -91.0% | +16.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.8% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$153M | $104M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $175M | $5.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 12.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TGT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TGT five years ago would be worth $7,095 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $676 for BBBY. Over the past 12 months, TGT leads with a +43.9% total return vs BBBY's +41.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TGT at -2.8% vs BBBY's -35.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.5% | +30.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.1% | +43.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.4% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.2% | -29.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.3% | +108.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.7% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
TGT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGT is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBBY's 3.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGT currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs BBBY's 41.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.12x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.65 | $133.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.74 | $83.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.8% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
TGT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BBBY as "Hold" and TGT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 46.5% upside for BBBY (target: $8) vs -11.4% for TGT (target: $115). TGT is the only dividend payer here at 3.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.75 | $115.31 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.7% |
TGT leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BBBY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
BBBY vs TGT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BBBY or TGT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Target Corporation (TGT) is the stronger pick with -1.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). Target Corporation (TGT) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (16. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY) a "Hold" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BBBY or TGT?
Over the past 5 years, Target Corporation (TGT) delivered a total return of -29.
1%, compared to -93. 2% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGT returned +108. 0% versus BBBY's -48. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BBBY or TGT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Target Corporation (TGT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
95β versus Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. 's 3. 12β — meaning BBBY is approximately 227% more volatile than TGT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 35% for Target Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BBBY or TGT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Target Corporation (TGT) is pulling ahead at -1.
7% versus -25. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. grew EPS 74. 6% year-over-year, compared to -8. 2% for Target Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGT leads at -1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BBBY or TGT?
Target Corporation (TGT) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
5% net margin versus -8. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGT leads at 4. 9% versus -5. 9% for BBBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGT leads at 27. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BBBY or TGT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBBY: 46.
5% to $7. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — BBBY or TGT?
In this comparison, TGT (3.
5% yield) pays a dividend. BBBY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BBBY or TGT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Target Corporation (TGT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
95), 3. 5% yield, +108. 0% 10Y return). Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY) carries a higher beta of 3. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TGT: +108. 0%, BBBY: -48. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BBBY and TGT?
These companies operate in different sectors (BBBY (Consumer Cyclical) and TGT (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BBBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock. TGT pays a dividend while BBBY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.