BBU vs APO

For growth investors, Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) is the stronger pick with 16. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 2% for Brookfield Business Partners L. P. (BBU). Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) offers the better valuation at 17. 8x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Business Partners L. P. (BBU) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Apollo Global Management, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 14. 6x.

Over the past 5 years, Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) delivered a total return of +142. 4%, compared to +8. 6% for Brookfield Business Partners L. P. (BBU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APO returned +768. 9% versus BBU's +108. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Business Partners L.

P. (BBU) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 33β versus Apollo Global Management, Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning APO is approximately 8% more volatile than BBU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 3% for Brookfield Business Partners L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) is pulling ahead at 16. 0% versus -31. 2% for Brookfield Business Partners L. P. (BBU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Business Partners L. P. grew EPS 38. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1. 0% for Apollo Global Management, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 8% net margin versus -0. 1% for Brookfield Business Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 14. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APO leads at 34. 4% versus 15. 1% for BBU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APO leads at 88. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 18. 3x for Brookfield Business Partners L. P. — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBU: 33. 5% to $42. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Brookfield Business Partners L. P. (BBU) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 6% for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 6% yield, +768. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APO: +768. 9%, BBU: +108. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (BBU (Industrials) and APO (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BBU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APO is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.