REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BDN vs DEA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
BDN vs DEA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $525M | $1.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $490M | $344M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-201M | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 70.2% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | 24.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 69.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.58B | $1.68B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $23M |
BDN vs DEA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brandywine Realty T… (BDN) | 100 | 31.3 | -68.7% |
| Easterly Government… (DEA) | 100 | 37.2 | -62.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BDN vs DEA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BDN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 17.8%
- Beta 0.73, yield 17.8%, current ratio 10.51x
- 17.8% yield, vs DEA's 9.0%
DEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth -37.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.6%
- -10.5% 10Y total return vs BDN's -37.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, current ratio 0.05x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% FFO/revenue growth vs BDN's -4.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.3% margin vs BDN's -41.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs BDN's 0.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 17.8% yield, vs DEA's 9.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.4% vs BDN's -18.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs BDN's -5.8%, ROIC 2.1% vs 1.9% |
BDN vs DEA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BDN vs DEA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BDN and DEA operate at a comparable scale, with $490M and $344M in trailing revenue. DEA is the more profitable business, keeping 4.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BDN's -41.0%. On growth, DEA holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $490M | $344M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $167M | $203M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$201M | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $53M | $262M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.2% | +49.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +24.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -41.0% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +76.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.5% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -75.0% | -55.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BDN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BDN's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DEA's 13.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $525M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.93x | 80.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 69.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.95x | 13.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 3.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.29x | 4.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DEA leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DEA delivers a 1.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-25 for BDN. DEA carries lower financial leverage with a 1.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BDN's 3.23x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.6% | +1.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.8% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.23x | 1.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.28x | 1.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DEA five years ago would be worth $6,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,487 for BDN. Over the past 12 months, DEA leads with a +21.4% total return vs BDN's -18.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BDN at 6.9% vs DEA's -6.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | +11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.0% | +21.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.0% | -17.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.1% | -37.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.0% | -10.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.9% | -6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
DEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DEA is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BDN's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DEA currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs BDN's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.63 | $24.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.47 | $19.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.2% | +93.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 386K |
Analyst Outlook
BDN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BDN as "Hold" and DEA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.9% upside for BDN (target: $4) vs -29.5% for DEA (target: $16). For income investors, BDN offers the higher dividend yield at 17.76% vs DEA's 9.01%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $16.41 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +17.8% | +9.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.54 | $2.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DEA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BDN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
BDN vs DEA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BDN or DEA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 2% for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN). Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) offers the better valuation at 80. 3x trailing P/E (69. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) a "Hold" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BDN or DEA?
Over the past 5 years, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) delivered a total return of -37. 9%, compared to -55. 1% for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DEA returned -10. 5% versus BDN's -37. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BDN or DEA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Brandywine Realty Trust's 0. 73β — meaning BDN is approximately 42% more volatile than DEA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 123% versus 3% for Brandywine Realty Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BDN or DEA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus -4. 2% for Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brandywine Realty Trust grew EPS 9. 6% year-over-year, compared to -37. 0% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DEA leads at 4. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BDN or DEA?
Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 9% net margin versus -37. 0% for Brandywine Realty Trust — meaning it keeps 3. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DEA leads at 24. 9% versus 16. 7% for BDN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DEA leads at -0. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BDN or DEA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BDN: 15.
9% to $3. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — BDN or DEA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) offers the highest yield at 17. 8%, versus 9. 0% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA).
08Is BDN or DEA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), 9. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DEA: -10. 5%, BDN: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BDN and DEA?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.