BEPH
Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4.625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes
Real Estate - Development
Market Cap$4.26B
5Y Perf.-39.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BEPH vs BEP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BEP
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
Renewable Utilities
Market Cap$10.57B
5Y Perf.-12.1%
BEPH vs BEP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BEPH | BEP |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $4.26B | $10.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.30B | $6.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-213M | $212M |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.0% | 13.3% |
| Total Debt | $35.90B | $35.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.13B | $2.31B |
BEPH vs BEP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BEPH
BEP
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield BRP Hold… (BEPH) | 100 | 60.8 | -39.2% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEP) | 100 | 87.9 | -12.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BEPH vs BEP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BEP leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4.625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BEPH
Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4.625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes
The Real Estate Income Play
BEPH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth -178.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 98.5%, current ratio 0.61x
- Beta 1.00, yield 23.7%, current ratio 0.61x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
BEP
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
The Income Pick
BEP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 11.7%
- 199.1% 10Y total return vs BEPH's -16.8%
- 3.3% margin vs BEPH's -3.4%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BEPH | 16.6% FFO/revenue growth vs BEP's 10.9% |
| Quality / Margins | BEP | 3.3% margin vs BEPH's -3.4% |
| Stability / Safety | BEP | Beta 0.85 vs BEPH's 1.00 |
| Dividends | BEPH | 23.7% yield, vs BEP's 11.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BEP | +60.8% vs BEPH's +9.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BEP | 0.2% ROA vs BEPH's -0.2%, ROIC 0.9% vs 1.3% |
BEPH vs BEP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBEPLAGGINGBEPH
BEPHBrookfield BRP Holdin…
1leads
BEPBrookfield Renewable …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BEPHMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BEPH3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
BEP5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BEP6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
BEP2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BEPH and BEP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEP and BEPH operate at a comparable scale, with $6.4B and $6.3B in trailing revenue. BEP is the more profitable business, keeping 3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEPH's -3.4%.
| Metric | BEPHBrookfield BRP Ho… | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.3B | $6.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.3B | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$213M | $212M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4.5B | -$8.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +44.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -71.9% | -128.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | +9.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.1% | +25.3% |
Evenly matched — BEPH and BEP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BEPH leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BEPH's 12.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BEP's 13.2x.
| Metric | BEPHBrookfield BRP Ho… | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $37.0B | $44.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.79x | -512.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.97x | 13.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 1.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.12x | 0.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
BEPH leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BEP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BEP delivers a 0.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-1 for BEPH. BEPH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.98x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BEP's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BEP scores 5/9 vs BEPH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BEPHBrookfield BRP Ho… | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.98x | 1.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32.8B | $33.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.1B | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35.9B | $35.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.54x | 1.04x |
BEP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BEP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BEP five years ago would be worth $11,256 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,404 for BEPH. Over the past 12 months, BEP leads with a +60.8% total return vs BEPH's +9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BEP at 7.3% vs BEPH's 7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BEPHBrookfield BRP Ho… | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.5% | +25.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.3% | +60.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.9% | +23.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.0% | +12.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.8% | +199.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.1% | +7.3% |
BEP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BEP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BEP is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEPH's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEP currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs BEPH's 88.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BEPHBrookfield BRP Ho… | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.89 | $35.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.51 | $22.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.5% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 875K |
BEP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BEPH and BEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, BEPH offers the higher dividend yield at 23.70% vs BEP's 11.70%.
| Metric | BEPHBrookfield BRP Ho… | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +23.7% | +11.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.54 | $4.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — BEPH and BEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
BEP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BEPH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallBrookfield Renewable Partne… (BEP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BEPH vs BEP: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BEPH or BEP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4.
625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes (BEPH) is the stronger pick with 16. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 9% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP). Analysts rate Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BEPH or BEP?
Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.
P. (BEP) delivered a total return of +12. 6%, compared to -16. 0% for Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4. 625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes (BEPH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BEP returned +199. 1% versus BEPH's -16. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BEPH or BEP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Renewable Partners L.
P. (BEP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4. 625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes's 1. 00β — meaning BEPH is approximately 17% more volatile than BEP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4. 625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes (BEPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 98% versus 102% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BEPH or BEP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4.
625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes (BEPH) is pulling ahead at 16. 6% versus 10. 9% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. grew EPS 92. 4% year-over-year, compared to -178. 1% for Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4. 625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEPH leads at 12. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BEPH or BEP?
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.
P. (BEP) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 3% net margin versus -3. 7% for Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4. 625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes — meaning it keeps -0. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BEPH leads at 18. 4% versus 13. 4% for BEP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEPH leads at 56. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BEPH or BEP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada 4. 625% Perpetual Subordinated Notes (BEPH) offers the highest yield at 23. 7%, versus 11. 7% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L. P. (BEP).
07Is BEPH or BEP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.
P. (BEP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 11. 7% yield, +199. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BEP: +199. 1%, BEPH: -16. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BEPH and BEP?
These companies operate in different sectors (BEPH (Real Estate) and BEP (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BEPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BEPH: 8.6% · BEP: 9.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.