Diversified Utilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BIP vs AQN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
BIP vs AQN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Diversified Utilities | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $17.15B | $4.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24.01B | $2.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $417M | $-27M |
| Gross Margin | 27.0% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | 25.2% | 20.9% |
| Forward P/E | 31.1x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $64.50B | $6.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.20B | $35M |
BIP vs AQN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Infrastr… (BIP) | 100 | 137.0 | +37.0% |
| Algonquin Power & U… (AQN) | 100 | 45.2 | -54.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIP vs AQN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BIP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 10.2%
- Rev growth 9.8%, EPS growth 7.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.0%
- 192.8% 10Y total return vs AQN's 31.8%
AQN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, current ratio 0.76x
- Lower P/E (17.5x vs 31.1x)
- Beta 0.35 vs BIP's 0.63, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.8% revenue growth vs AQN's -3.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.5x vs 31.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.7% margin vs AQN's -1.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs BIP's 0.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs AQN's 5.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.8% vs AQN's +20.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.3% ROA vs AQN's -0.2%, ROIC 4.8% vs 2.5% |
BIP vs AQN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BIP vs AQN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BIP and AQN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIP is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.0B annually — 10.1x AQN's $2.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.7% (BIP) to -1.1% (AQN). On growth, BIP holds the edge at +16.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24.0B | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.2B | $815M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $417M | -$27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13.7B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +65.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +20.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | -1.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.2% | +109.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.9% | +1.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.2% | +102.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BIP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BIP's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AQN's 12.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.2B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $78.5B | $11.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.89x | -3.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.07x | 17.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.13x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.99x | 12.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.74x | 2.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.48x | 0.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIP delivers a 1.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-0 for AQN. AQN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIP's 1.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIP scores 8/9 vs AQN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.2% | -0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.82x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $61.3B | $6.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.2B | $35M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $64.5B | $6.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.81x | 1.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BIP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BIP five years ago would be worth $12,716 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,649 for AQN. Over the past 12 months, BIP leads with a +24.8% total return vs AQN's +20.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BIP at 5.8% vs AQN's -5.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +4.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.8% | +20.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.3% | -16.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.2% | -43.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.8% | +31.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.8% | -5.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BIP and AQN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AQN is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIP's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIP currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs AQN's 89.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.32 | $7.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.63 | $5.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.1% | +89.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 51.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
BIP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BIP as "Buy" and AQN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.4% upside for BIP (target: $46) vs 7.3% for AQN (target: $7). For income investors, BIP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.20% vs AQN's 5.86%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.20 | $6.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.2% | +5.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.79 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% |
BIP leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
BIP vs AQN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIP or AQN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) is the stronger pick with 9. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 5% for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN). Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) offers the better valuation at 37. 9x trailing P/E (31. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BIP or AQN?
On forward P/E, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.
is actually cheaper at 17. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BIP or AQN?
Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) delivered a total return of +27. 2%, compared to -43. 5% for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BIP returned +192. 8% versus AQN's +31. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BIP or AQN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.
(AQN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. 's 0. 63β — meaning BIP is approximately 79% more volatile than AQN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 108% versus 182% for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BIP or AQN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) is pulling ahead at 9. 8% versus -3. 5% for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. grew EPS 716. 7% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIP leads at 17. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BIP or AQN?
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 9% net margin versus -59. 5% for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIP leads at 25. 1% versus 19. 2% for AQN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AQN leads at 74. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BIP or AQN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.
(AQN) trades at 17. 5x forward P/E versus 31. 1x for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BIP: 24. 4% to $46. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — BIP or AQN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) offers the highest yield at 10. 2%, versus 5. 9% for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN).
09Is BIP or AQN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.
(AQN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 5. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AQN: +31. 8%, BIP: +192. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BIP and AQN?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.