Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BLNK vs TPVG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$98M
5Y Perf.-49.2%
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$226M
5Y Perf.-44.4%

BLNK vs TPVG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BLNK logoBLNK
TPVG logoTPVG
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionAsset Management
Market Cap$98M$226M
Revenue (TTM)$106M$97M
Net Income (TTM)$-126M$46M
Gross Margin26.0%83.5%
Operating Margin-119.5%77.9%
Forward P/E6.0x
Total Debt$11M$469M
Cash & Equiv.$42M$20M

BLNK vs TPVGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BLNK
TPVG
StockMay 20May 26Return
Blink Charging Co. (BLNK)10050.8-49.2%
TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG)10055.6-44.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BLNK vs TPVG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TPVG leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Blink Charging Co. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
The Momentum Pick

BLNK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +17.8% vs TPVG's +8.6%
Best for: momentum
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick

TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 18.4%
  • Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
  • 87.8% 10Y total return vs BLNK's -97.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTPVG logoTPVG36.6% NII/revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
Quality / MarginsTPVG logoTPVG50.6% margin vs BLNK's -118.7%
Stability / SafetyTPVG logoTPVGBeta 0.83 vs BLNK's 2.96
DividendsTPVG logoTPVG18.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BLNK logoBLNK+17.8% vs TPVG's +8.6%
Efficiency (ROA)TPVG logoTPVG5.6% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 7.2% vs -109.7%

BLNK vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BLNKBlink Charging Co.
FY 2024
Product
57.7%$82M
Service
15.1%$21M
Host Provider Fees
9.1%$13M
Network
6.2%$9M
Warranty
4.5%$6M
Depreciation and Amortization
4.4%$6M
Warranty And Repairs And Maintenance
1.8%$3M
Other (1)
1.1%$2M
TPVGTriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

BLNK vs TPVG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTPVGLAGGINGBLNK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

BLNK and TPVG operate at a comparable scale, with $106M and $97M in trailing revenue. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLNK's -118.7%.

MetricBLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$106M$97M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$115M$63M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$126M$46M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$47M$35M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+26.0%+83.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-119.5%+77.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-118.7%+50.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-44.5%-58.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+99.9%-100.0%
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BLNK leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricBLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Market CapShares × price$98M$226M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$67M$674M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.44x4.57x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.50x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.90x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.79x2.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.73x0.63x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
BLNK leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

TPVG delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-132 for BLNK. BLNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPVG scores 5/9 vs BLNK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-131.9%+13.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-66.7%+5.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-109.7%+7.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-77.3%+9.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.09x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$31M$449M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$42M$20M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$11M$469M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9064.60x2.15x
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TPVG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TPVG five years ago would be worth $8,097 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $266 for BLNK. Over the past 12 months, BLNK leads with a +17.8% total return vs TPVG's +8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPVG at -2.6% vs BLNK's -50.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+16.0%-12.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+17.8%+8.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.0%-7.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.3%-19.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.3%+87.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-50.6%-2.6%
TPVG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TPVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TPVG currently trades 74.0% from its 52-week high vs BLNK's 32.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.96x0.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.65$7.53
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.45$4.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+32.4%+74.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.655.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.1M498K
TPVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 18.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.95
# AnalystsCovering analysts12
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+18.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

TPVG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BLNK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallTriplePoint Venture Growth … (TPVG)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BLNK vs TPVG: Frequently Asked Questions

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BLNK or TPVG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — BLNK or TPVG?

Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) delivered a total return of -19. 0%, compared to -97. 3% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +87. 8% versus BLNK's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — BLNK or TPVG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 2. 96β — meaning BLNK is approximately 255% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — BLNK or TPVG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to 38. 9% for Blink Charging Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — BLNK or TPVG?

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -159. 2% for Blink Charging Co. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -160. 6% for BLNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — BLNK or TPVG?

In this comparison, TPVG (18.

4% yield) pays a dividend. BLNK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is BLNK or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 18. 4% yield). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +87. 8%, BLNK: -97. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between BLNK and TPVG?

These companies operate in different sectors (BLNK (Industrials) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. TPVG pays a dividend while BLNK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BLNK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TPVG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BLNK and TPVG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BLNK: 11.7% · TPVG: 36.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.