Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Box, Inc. (BOX) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MSFT | 14.9% revenue growth vs BOX's 5.0% |
| Value | BOX | Lower P/E (18.3x vs 23.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | MSFT | 39.0% net margin vs BOX's 19.7% |
| Stability / Safety | BOX | Beta 0.55 vs MSFT's 0.88 |
| Dividends | MSFT | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs BOX's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MSFT | -0.2% vs BOX's -28.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MSFT | 17.9% ROA vs BOX's 14.1%, ROIC 27.9% vs 25.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Box is a cloud content management platform that helps organizations securely store, share, and collaborate on files from any device. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its SaaS platform — with enterprise customers accounting for the majority of its recurring revenue — and additional services like implementation and support. The company's competitive advantage lies in its deep security and compliance features — particularly for regulated industries — and its extensive enterprise integrations that create switching costs.
Microsoft is a global technology company that develops software, cloud services, and hardware products. It generates revenue primarily through cloud services like Azure (~40% of revenue), productivity software including Office 365 and Dynamics, and personal computing through Windows licensing and Surface devices. Its key competitive advantage is the deeply entrenched enterprise ecosystem—Windows and Office dominance creates a powerful network effect that drives adoption of its cloud and productivity suites.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MSFT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BOX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $305.5B annually — 265.4x BOX's $1.2B. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOX's 19.7%. On growth, MSFT holds the edge at +16.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BOXBox, Inc. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $305.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $100M | $184.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $227M | $119.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $335M | $77.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.9% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +46.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +39.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +25.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +16.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.8% | +59.8% |
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, BOX trades at a 40% valuation discount to MSFT's 28.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MSFT's 18.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BOX's 34.3x.
| Metric | BOXBox, Inc. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $2.95T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.32x | 28.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.30x | 23.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 34.33x | 18.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.11x | 10.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.74x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.30x | 40.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BOX delivers a 108.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $108 in annual profit, vs $31 for MSFT. MSFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOX's 3.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSFT scores 6/9 vs BOX's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BOXBox, Inc. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +108.4% | +30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.1% | +17.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.8% | +27.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.2% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.66x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $97M | $30.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $625M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $721M | $60.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.33x | 56.44x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,186 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,408 for BOX. Over the past 12 months, MSFT leads with a -0.2% total return vs BOX's -28.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSFT at 17.3% vs BOX's -11.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BOXBox, Inc. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.3% | -16.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.0% | -0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.4% | +61.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.1% | +71.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.6% | +718.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.0% | +17.3% |
Risk & Volatility
BOX is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSFT's 0.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSFT currently trades 70.7% from its 52-week high vs BOX's 60.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BOXBox, Inc. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.80 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.62 | $344.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.7% | +70.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.4 | 39.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BOX as "Buy" and MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.9% upside for BOX (target: $36) vs 48.6% for MSFT (target: $584). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.82% vs BOX's 0.43%.
| Metric | BOXBox, Inc. | MSFTMicrosoft Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.00 | $583.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 78 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.2% | +0.6% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Box, Inc. (BOX) | 100 | 154.51 | +54.5% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 261.32 | +161.3% |
Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) returned +72% over 5 years vs Box, Inc. (BOX)'s +24%. A $10,000 investment in MSFT 5 years ago would be worth $17,186 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Box, Inc. (BOX) | $303M | $1.1B | +260.1% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | $91.2B | $281.7B | +209.1% |
Box, Inc.'s revenue grew from $303M (2016) to $1.1B (2025) — a 15.3% CAGR. Microsoft Corporation's revenue grew from $91.2B (2016) to $281.7B (2025) — a 13.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Box, Inc. (BOX) | -67.0% | 22.4% | +133.5% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 22.5% | 36.1% | +60.4% |
Box, Inc.'s net margin went from -67% (2016) to 22% (2025). Microsoft Corporation's net margin went from 23% (2016) to 36% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Box, Inc. (BOX) | 142.3 | 22 | -84.5% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 26.3 | 35.5 | +35.0% |
Box, Inc. has traded in a 22x–142x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~17x. Microsoft Corporation has traded in a 25x–48x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~29x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Box, Inc. (BOX) | -1.67 | 1.36 | +181.4% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 2.1 | 13.64 | +549.5% |
Box, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-1.67 (2016) to $1.36 (2025). Microsoft Corporation's EPS grew from $2.10 (2016) to $13.64 (2025) — a 23% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Box, Inc. generated $330M FCF in 2025 (+83% vs 2021). Microsoft Corporation generated $72B FCF in 2025 (+28% vs 2021).
BOX vs MSFT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOX or MSFT a better buy right now?
Box, Inc. (BOX) offers the better valuation at 17.3x trailing P/E (18.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Box, Inc. (BOX) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOX or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Box, Inc. (BOX) is the cheapest at 17.3x versus Microsoft Corporation at 28.8x. On forward P/E, Box, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18.3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOX or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +71.9%, compared to +24.1% for Box, Inc. (BOX). A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +718.2% versus BOX's +104.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOX or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Box, Inc. (BOX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.55β versus Microsoft Corporation's 0.88β — meaning MSFT is approximately 62% more volatile than BOX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 4% for Box, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — BOX or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.1% net margin versus 22.4% for Box, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45.6% versus 7.3% for BOX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BOX leads at 79.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BOX or MSFT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Box, Inc. (BOX) trades at 18.3x forward P/E versus 23.8x for Microsoft Corporation — 5.5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BOX: 52.9% to $36.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BOX or MSFT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the highest yield at 0.8%, versus 0.4% for Box, Inc. (BOX).
08Is BOX or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.88), 0.8% yield, +718.2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +718.2%, BOX: +104.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BOX and MSFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: BOX is a small-cap deep-value stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while BOX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.