BTU vs AMR

For growth investors, Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) is the stronger pick with -8.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 8% for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) offers the better valuation at 13. 8x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) a "Hold" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Peabody Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 8.

2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.

(AMR) delivered a total return of +1441%, compared to +461. 0% for Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMR returned +1346% versus BTU's -7. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

18β versus Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning AMR is approximately 404% more volatile than BTU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 14% for Peabody Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) is pulling ahead at -8.

9% versus -14. 8% for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. grew EPS -71. 0% year-over-year, compared to -115. 9% for Peabody Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMR leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.

(AMR) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus -1. 4% for Peabody Energy Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMR leads at 7. 7% versus 0. 0% for BTU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMR leads at 11. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) trades at 8.

2x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTU: 46. 2% to $36. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 1% for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

18), 1. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BTU: -7. 2%, AMR: +1346%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BTU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMR is a small-cap deep-value stock. BTU pays a dividend while AMR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.