CANG
Cango Inc.
Auto - Dealerships
Market Cap$254M
5Y Perf.-77.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CANG vs CAAS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$138M
5Y Perf.+136.1%
CANG vs CAAS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CANG | CAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $254M | $138M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.46B | $696M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-178M | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 13.6% | 16.5% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 5.9% |
| Forward P/E | 5.8x | 7.2x |
| Total Debt | $170M | $209M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.29B | $142M |
CANG vs CAAS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CANG
CAAS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 22.7 | -77.3% |
| China Automotive Sy… (CAAS) | 100 | 236.1 | +136.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CANG vs CAAS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CAAS leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Cango Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CANG
Cango Inc.
The Income Pick
CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 2.25
- Lower volatility, beta 2.25, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 1.88x
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 7.2x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CAAS
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
The Growth Play
CAAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 17.6%, EPS growth 43.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
- 33.5% 10Y total return vs CANG's -44.7%
- Beta 0.42, yield 1.6%, current ratio 1.36x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CAAS | 17.6% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% |
| Value | CANG | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 7.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | CAAS | 4.2% margin vs CANG's -5.2% |
| Stability / Safety | CAAS | Beta 0.42 vs CANG's 2.25 |
| Dividends | CAAS | 1.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CAAS | +14.5% vs CANG's -72.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CAAS | 3.5% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC 8.8% vs 4.6% |
CANG vs CAAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
CANG vs CAAS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCAASLAGGINGCANG
CANGCango Inc.
1leads
CAASChina Automotive Syst…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CANGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CAAS4/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CAAS6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CAAS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CAAS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CANG1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CANG and CAAS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 5.0x CAAS's $696M. CAAS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CANG's -5.2%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CANGCango Inc. | CAASChina Automotive … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.5B | $696M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $333M | $60M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$178M | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +16.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -154.0% | -0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.3% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +4.2% |
Evenly matched — CANG and CAAS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CAAS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CAAS trades at a 44% valuation discount to CANG's 5.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAAS's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CANG's 3.3x.
| Metric | CANGCango Inc. | CAASChina Automotive … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $254M | $138M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $90M | $206M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.76x | 3.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.30x | 2.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.15x | 0.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.42x | 0.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.94x |
CAAS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAAS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAAS delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CANG. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAAS's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAAS scores 7/9 vs CANG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CANGCango Inc. | CAASChina Automotive … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.1% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | +13.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | $67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $142M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $170M | $209M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.87x | 22.18x |
CAAS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAAS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAAS five years ago would be worth $12,659 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,608 for CANG. Over the past 12 months, CAAS leads with a +14.5% total return vs CANG's -72.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAAS at 7.4% vs CANG's 0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CANGCango Inc. | CAASChina Automotive … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -61.3% | +6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -72.8% | +14.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.8% | +24.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | +26.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.7% | +33.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.9% | +7.4% |
CAAS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAAS currently trades 88.9% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CANGCango Inc. | CAASChina Automotive … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.25x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.88 | $5.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.33 | $3.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.9% | +88.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 29K |
CAAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CAAS is the only dividend payer here at 1.58% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CANGCango Inc. | CAASChina Automotive … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | 0.0% |
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
CAAS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CANG leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallChina Automotive Systems, I… (CAAS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CANG vs CAAS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CANG or CAAS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is the stronger pick with 17. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CANG or CAAS?
On trailing P/E, China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Cango Inc. at 5. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CANG or CAAS?
Over the past 5 years, China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) delivered a total return of +26. 6%, compared to -13. 9% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAAS returned +33. 5% versus CANG's -44. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CANG or CAAS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 442% more volatile than CAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 46% for China Automotive Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CANG or CAAS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is pulling ahead at 17. 6% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to 43. 4% for China Automotive Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAAS leads at 13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CANG or CAAS?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus 5. 6% for China Automotive Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus 7. 8% for CAAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — CANG or CAAS?
In this comparison, CAAS (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. CANG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CANG or CAAS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, China Automotive Systems, Inc.
(CAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 1. 6% yield). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAAS: +33. 5%, CANG: -44. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CANG and CAAS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CAAS is a small-cap high-growth stock. CAAS pays a dividend while CANG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CANG: 5833.4% · CAAS: 11.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CANG: 5.8x · CAAS: 3.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.