Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CARM vs MGTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
CARM vs MGTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $795K | $1.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $53M | $80M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $-121M |
| Gross Margin | 98.1% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | -131.9% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $89M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $66M |
CARM vs MGTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carisma Therapeutic… (CARM) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| MeiraGTx Holdings p… (MGTX) | 100 | 90.4 | -9.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CARM vs MGTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CARM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.76, current ratio 1.48x
- Beta -0.76, current ratio 1.48x
- 15.3% margin vs MGTX's -151.1%
MGTX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 144.6%, EPS growth 33.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.3%
- -24.5% 10Y total return vs CARM's -99.1%
- 144.6% revenue growth vs CARM's 31.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 144.6% revenue growth vs CARM's 31.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs MGTX's -151.1% | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.7% vs CARM's -96.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 55.5% ROA vs MGTX's -55.0% |
CARM vs MGTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CARM vs MGTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CARM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $80M annually — 1.5x CARM's $53M. CARM is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGTX's -151.1%. On growth, CARM holds the edge at +12.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $53M | $80M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13M | -$92M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | -$121M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$22M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +98.1% | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | -131.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | -151.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -42.6% | -2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | -84.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.5% | -11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CARM and MGTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $795,056 | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$15M | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -7.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 12.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CARM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +55.5% | -55.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -141.2% | -64.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $66M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $89M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -8.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MGTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGTX five years ago would be worth $7,370 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $44 for CARM. Over the past 12 months, MGTX leads with a +74.7% total return vs CARM's -96.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGTX at 15.5% vs CARM's -87.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -56.8% | +44.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.2% | +74.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +54.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -26.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | -24.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -87.0% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CARM and MGTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CARM is the less volatile stock with a -0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGTX's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGTX currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs CARM's 3.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.76x | 1.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.56 | $11.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $6.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.4% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 822K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CARM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MGTX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CARM vs MGTX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CARM or MGTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) is the stronger pick with 144.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 31. 6% for Carisma Therapeutics, Inc. (CARM). Analysts rate MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CARM or MGTX?
Over the past 5 years, MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) delivered a total return of -26.
3%, compared to -99. 6% for Carisma Therapeutics, Inc. (CARM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGTX returned -24. 5% versus CARM's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CARM or MGTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carisma Therapeutics, Inc.
(CARM) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 76β versus MeiraGTx Holdings plc's 1. 89β — meaning MGTX is approximately -349% more volatile than CARM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CARM or MGTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) is pulling ahead at 144.
6% versus 31. 6% for Carisma Therapeutics, Inc. (CARM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carisma Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to 33. 0% for MeiraGTx Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGTX leads at 72. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CARM or MGTX?
MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) is the more profitable company, earning -140.
3% net margin versus -308. 1% for Carisma Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps -140. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGTX leads at -130. 2% versus -316. 7% for CARM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGTX leads at 94. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CARM or MGTX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CARM or MGTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Carisma Therapeutics, Inc.
(CARM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 76)). MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CARM: -99. 1%, MGTX: -24. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CARM and MGTX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.