Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CBRL vs EAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
CBRL vs EAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $687M | $6.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.36B | $5.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $463M |
| Gross Margin | 25.4% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | -0.4% | 10.4% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.13B | $1.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40M | $19M |
CBRL vs EAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cracker Barrel Old … (CBRL) | 100 | 28.7 | -71.3% |
| Brinker Internation… (EAT) | 100 | 558.3 | +458.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBRL vs EAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBRL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 3.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, current ratio 0.50x
- 3.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
EAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 144.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.3%
- 236.3% 10Y total return vs CBRL's -45.5%
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 0.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.9% revenue growth vs CBRL's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 14.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.1% margin vs CBRL's -0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs CBRL's 1.38 | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.8% vs CBRL's -25.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs CBRL's -0.2%, ROIC 19.1% vs 2.6% |
CBRL vs EAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CBRL vs EAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 1.7x CBRL's $3.4B. EAT is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBRL's -0.1%. On growth, EAT holds the edge at +3.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $5.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $120M | $819M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $463M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$21M | $504M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | +10.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.9% | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -94.2% | +12.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CBRL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.9x trailing earnings, CBRL trades at a 16% valuation discount to EAT's 17.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CBRL's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EAT's 11.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $687M | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $8.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.91x | 17.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.35x | 11.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 1.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 18.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.40x | 15.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EAT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EAT delivers a 123.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $123 in annual profit, vs $-1 for CBRL. CBRL carries lower financial leverage with a 2.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EAT's 4.57x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.9% | +123.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +25.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.44x | 4.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40M | $19M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.57x | 18.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EAT five years ago would be worth $23,182 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,964 for CBRL. Over the past 12 months, EAT leads with a +9.8% total return vs CBRL's -25.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EAT at 58.5% vs CBRL's -27.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.3% | -2.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.6% | +9.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.5% | +298.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.4% | +131.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.5% | +236.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.9% | +58.5% |
Risk & Volatility
EAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EAT is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBRL's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EAT currently trades 78.6% from its 52-week high vs CBRL's 42.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.93 | $187.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.85 | $100.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.7% | +78.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CBRL as "Hold" and EAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for EAT (target: $184) vs -0.4% for CBRL (target: $31). CBRL is the only dividend payer here at 3.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.60 | $184.46 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +1.4% |
EAT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CBRL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CBRL vs EAT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBRL or EAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL). Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBRL or EAT?
On trailing P/E, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
(CBRL) is the cheapest at 14. 9x versus Brinker International, Inc. at 17. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBRL or EAT?
Over the past 5 years, Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) delivered a total return of +131. 8%, compared to -70. 4% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EAT returned +236. 3% versus CBRL's -45. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBRL or EAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. 's 1. 38β — meaning CBRL is approximately 23% more volatile than EAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Brinker International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBRL or EAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus 0. 4% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brinker International, Inc. grew EPS 144. 7% year-over-year, compared to 12. 6% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EAT leads at 12. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBRL or EAT?
Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus 1. 3% for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EAT leads at 9. 5% versus 1. 6% for CBRL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBRL leads at 33. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBRL or EAT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EAT: 25.
4% to $184. 46.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBRL or EAT?
In this comparison, CBRL (3.
3% yield) pays a dividend. EAT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CBRL or EAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
(CBRL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBRL: -45. 5%, EAT: +236. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBRL and EAT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CBRL is a small-cap deep-value stock; EAT is a small-cap high-growth stock. CBRL pays a dividend while EAT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.