CC
The Chemours Company
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$3.36B
5Y Perf.+70.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CC vs OLN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
OLN
Olin Corporation
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.+122.4%
CC vs OLN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CC | OLN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $3.36B | $3.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.82B | $6.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-411M | $-127M |
| Gross Margin | 15.1% | 5.3% |
| Operating Margin | -0.8% | -1.6% |
| Forward P/E | 15.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $4.58B | $3.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $672M | $168M |
CC vs OLN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CC
OLN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Chemours Company (CC) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
| Olin Corporation (OLN) | 100 | 222.4 | +122.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CC vs OLN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OLN leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. The Chemours Company is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CC
The Chemours Company
The Long-Run Compounder
CC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 219.7% 10Y total return vs OLN's 61.0%
- +108.8% vs OLN's +35.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
OLN
Olin Corporation
The Income Pick
OLN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.47, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth -140.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.47, current ratio 1.35x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | OLN | 3.7% revenue growth vs CC's 0.4% |
| Value | OLN | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | OLN | -1.9% margin vs CC's -7.1% |
| Stability / Safety | OLN | Beta 1.47 vs CC's 1.92, lower leverage |
| Dividends | OLN | 3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CC's 2.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CC | +108.8% vs OLN's +35.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OLN | -1.7% ROA vs CC's -5.5%, ROIC 1.7% vs -0.1% |
CC vs OLN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
CC vs OLN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOLNLAGGINGCC
CCThe Chemours Company
2leads
OLNOlin Corporation
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CC4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OLN5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
OLN8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CC6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
OLN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
OLN2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OLN and CC operate at a comparable scale, with $6.7B and $5.8B in trailing revenue. OLN is the more profitable business, keeping -1.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CC's -7.1%. On growth, CC holds the edge at +1.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CCThe Chemours Comp… | OLNOlin Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.8B | $6.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132M | $284M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$411M | -$127M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $198M | $352M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +5.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | -1.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | -1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.0% | -3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | -61.8% |
CC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
OLN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, OLN's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CC's 21.7x.
| Metric | CCThe Chemours Comp… | OLNOlin Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.3B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.75x | -72.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.55x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.72x | 9.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.44x | 1.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 65.93x | 12.29x |
OLN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OLN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OLN delivers a -6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-163 for CC. OLN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.76x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CC's 18.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OLN scores 5/9 vs CC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CCThe Chemours Comp… | OLNOlin Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -163.4% | -6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.5% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 18.27x | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.9B | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $672M | $168M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.15x | 0.66x |
OLN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CC five years ago would be worth $7,726 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,609 for OLN. Over the past 12 months, CC leads with a +108.8% total return vs OLN's +35.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CC at -5.5% vs OLN's -19.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CCThe Chemours Comp… | OLNOlin Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +83.6% | +25.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +108.8% | +35.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.7% | -46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.7% | -33.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +219.7% | +61.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.5% | -19.0% |
CC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OLN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OLN is the less volatile stock with a 1.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CC's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OLN currently trades 87.8% from its 52-week high vs CC's 78.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CCThe Chemours Comp… | OLNOlin Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.67 | $30.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.13 | $18.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.1% | +87.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 2.7M |
OLN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
OLN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CC as "Hold" and OLN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -1.2% upside for CC (target: $22) vs -9.1% for OLN (target: $24). For income investors, OLN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.99% vs CC's 2.31%.
| Metric | CCThe Chemours Comp… | OLNOlin Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.14 | $24.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.52 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% |
OLN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
OLN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).
Best OverallOlin Corporation (OLN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CC vs OLN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CC or OLN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Olin Corporation (OLN) is the stronger pick with 3.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for The Chemours Company (CC). Analysts rate The Chemours Company (CC) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CC or OLN?
Over the past 5 years, The Chemours Company (CC) delivered a total return of -22.
7%, compared to -33. 9% for Olin Corporation (OLN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CC returned +219. 7% versus OLN's +61. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CC or OLN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Olin Corporation (OLN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
47β versus The Chemours Company's 1. 92β — meaning CC is approximately 30% more volatile than OLN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Olin Corporation (OLN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 176% versus 18% for The Chemours Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CC or OLN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Olin Corporation (OLN) is pulling ahead at 3.
7% versus 0. 4% for The Chemours Company (CC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Olin Corporation grew EPS -140. 7% year-over-year, compared to -549. 1% for The Chemours Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CC leads at -5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CC or OLN?
Olin Corporation (OLN) is the more profitable company, earning -0.
6% net margin versus -6. 6% for The Chemours Company — meaning it keeps -0. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLN leads at 1. 7% versus -0. 1% for CC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CC leads at 15. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CC or OLN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CC: -1.
2% to $22. 14.
07Which pays a better dividend — CC or OLN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Olin Corporation (OLN) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 3% for The Chemours Company (CC).
08Is CC or OLN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Olin Corporation (OLN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3.
0% yield). The Chemours Company (CC) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OLN: +61. 0%, CC: +219. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CC and OLN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CC: 1.0% · OLN: -3.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.