Beverages - Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CCU vs TAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Alcoholic
CCU vs TAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $2.21B | $8.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.88T | $11.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $115.38B | $-2.11B |
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | 37.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | -20.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.33T | $6.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $520.66B | $897M |
CCU vs TAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compañía Cervecería… (CCU) | 100 | 85.4 | -14.6% |
| Molson Coors Bevera… (TAP) | 100 | 112.6 | +12.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCU vs TAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -11.4% 10Y total return vs TAP's -41.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 81.9%, current ratio 1.90x
- Beta 0.81, yield 3.7%, current ratio 1.90x
TAP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta -0.01, yield 4.5%
- Rev growth -4.2%, EPS growth -302.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- -4.2% revenue growth vs CCU's -4.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.2% revenue growth vs CCU's -4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 9.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.0% margin vs TAP's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (59.8% vs 81.9%) | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CCU's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -20.9% vs TAP's -21.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs TAP's -8.9%, ROIC 6.3% vs -10.1% |
CCU vs TAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CCU vs TAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CCU and TAP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCU is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.88T annually — 257.6x TAP's $11.2B. CCU is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TAP's -18.9%. On growth, TAP holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.88T | $11.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $272.7B | -$1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $115.4B | -$2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $117.1B | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.4% | +37.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | -20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | -18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.7% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.9% | +35.6% |
Valuation Metrics
TAP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $8.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $13.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.89x | -3.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.02x | 9.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.80x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.01x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.72x | 0.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.24x | 0.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.79x | 7.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCU delivers a 7.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-19 for TAP. TAP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCU's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCU scores 6/9 vs TAP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | -18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | -8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | -10.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | -11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $806.9B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $520.7B | $897M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.33T | $6.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.65x | -9.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CCU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TAP five years ago would be worth $8,532 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,227 for CCU. Over the past 12 months, CCU leads with a -20.9% total return vs TAP's -21.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CCU at -8.5% vs TAP's -9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.8% | -8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.9% | -21.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.4% | -25.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.7% | -14.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | -41.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.5% | -9.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CCU and TAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TAP is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCU's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | -0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.57 | $57.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.71 | $40.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.9% | +74.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 43.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 207K | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
TAP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CCU as "Hold" and TAP as "Hold". For income investors, TAP offers the higher dividend yield at 4.50% vs CCU's 3.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $48.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $403.10 | $1.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.1% |
TAP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). CCU leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
CCU vs TAP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCU or TAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the stronger pick with -4.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU). Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCU or TAP?
On forward P/E, Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.
A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCU or TAP?
Over the past 5 years, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) delivered a total return of -14.
7%, compared to -17. 7% for Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCU returned -11. 4% versus TAP's -41. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCU or TAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
01β versus Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. 's 0. 81β — meaning CCU is approximately -6795% more volatile than TAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 82% for Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCU or TAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is pulling ahead at -4.
2% versus -4. 7% for Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. grew EPS -30. 5% year-over-year, compared to -302. 8% for Molson Coors Beverage Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, TAP leads at 1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCU or TAP?
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.
A. (CCU) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 0% net margin versus -19. 2% for Molson Coors Beverage Company — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCU leads at 7. 3% versus -21. 0% for TAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCU leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCU or TAP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.
A. (CCU) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 9. 1x for Molson Coors Beverage Company — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCU or TAP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 3. 7% for Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU).
09Is CCU or TAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
01), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAP: -41. 2%, CCU: -11. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCU and TAP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCU is a small-cap deep-value stock; TAP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.