CDTG
CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares
Waste Management
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-92.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CDTG vs CLFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$419M
5Y Perf.+0.5%
CDTG vs CLFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CDTG | CLFD |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $3M | $419M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-9M |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.5% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 2.0x | 58.2x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124K | $21M |
CDTG vs CLFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CDTG
CLFD
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDT Environmental T… (CDTG) | 100 | 8.0 | -92.0% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 100.5 | +0.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CDTG vs CLFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CDTG leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Clearfield, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CDTG
CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares
The Income Pick
CDTG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.34
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 15.1%, current ratio 1.50x
- Beta 0.34, current ratio 1.50x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.
The Growth Play
CLFD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.9%
- 66.7% 10Y total return vs CDTG's -91.7%
- 19.6% revenue growth vs CDTG's -13.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CLFD | 19.6% revenue growth vs CDTG's -13.0% |
| Value | CDTG | Lower P/E (2.0x vs 58.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | CDTG | 19.8% margin vs CLFD's -6.3% |
| Stability / Safety | CDTG | Beta 0.34 vs CLFD's 1.79 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CLFD | -2.1% vs CDTG's -61.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CDTG | 8.0% ROA vs CLFD's -3.0%, ROIC 3.6% vs 0.6% |
CDTG vs CLFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCDTGLAGGINGCLFD
CLFDClearfield, Inc.
1leads
CDTGCDT Environmental Tec…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CLFDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CDTG3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CDTG5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CLFD6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CDTG and CLFD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $136M annually — 3.8x CDTG's $36M. CDTG is the more profitable business, keeping 19.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLFD's -6.3%. On growth, CLFD holds the edge at -27.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CDTGCDT Environmental… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.2% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | -6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -87.3% | -27.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -142.5% |
Evenly matched — CDTG and CLFD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CDTG leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CDTG's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLFD's 49.3x.
| Metric | CDTGCDT Environmental… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $419M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $407M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.96x | -52.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 58.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.63x | 49.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 2.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.08x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.97x |
CDTG leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDTG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDTG delivers a 19.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CLFD. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CDTG's 0.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs CDTG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CDTGCDT Environmental… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.1% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124,379 | $21M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 52.81x | 85.32x |
CDTG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLFD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLFD five years ago would be worth $7,818 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $833 for CDTG. Over the past 12 months, CLFD leads with a -2.1% total return vs CDTG's -61.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLFD at -5.7% vs CDTG's -56.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CDTGCDT Environmental… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.9% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.5% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.7% | -16.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.7% | -21.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.7% | +66.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.3% | -5.7% |
CLFD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CDTG and CLFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CDTG is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLFD's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLFD currently trades 64.8% from its 52-week high vs CDTG's 12.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CDTGCDT Environmental… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.13 | $46.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.21 | $24.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.9% | +64.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.7 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 619K | 132K |
Evenly matched — CDTG and CLFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | CDTGCDT Environmental… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +20.2% | +4.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CDTG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CLFD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallCDT Environmental Technolog… (CDTG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CDTG vs CLFD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CDTG or CLFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is the stronger pick with 19. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CDTG or CLFD?
Over the past 5 years, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) delivered a total return of -21. 8%, compared to -91. 7% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLFD returned +66. 7% versus CDTG's -91. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CDTG or CLFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
34β versus Clearfield, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning CLFD is approximately 420% more volatile than CDTG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 15% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CDTG or CLFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is pulling ahead at 19. 6% versus -13. 0% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearfield, Inc. grew EPS 31. 8% year-over-year, compared to -79. 7% for CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDTG leads at 8. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CDTG or CLFD?
CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
9% net margin versus -5. 4% for Clearfield, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDTG leads at 6. 7% versus 1. 4% for CLFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDTG leads at 37. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CDTG or CLFD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CDTG or CLFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares (CDTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
34)). Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CDTG: -91. 7%, CLFD: +66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CDTG and CLFD?
These companies operate in different sectors (CDTG (Industrials) and CLFD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CDTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CDTG: -87.3% · CLFD: -27.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.